Thanks for this list. I will check into.
Bruce Butler
IT Manager
Knappe & Koester, Inc.
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Comeau, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:36 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
* Bruce,
You may wish to ask this to the Active Directory mailing list -
these
guys are top notch in the world (http://activedir.org
<http://activedir.org/> ). Join up and search their archives
and ask as
I am sure they have done this and have real world experience.
From what
I have seen, some even virtualized Exchange, but large
bridgehead
servers are not done (at least not yet).
Steven Comeau
Manager, Corporate IT Systems
Main Tape
1 Capital Drive, Suite 101
Cranbury, NJ 08512
800-718-8273 x332
_____
From: Bruce Butler [mailto:bbutler@...]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 6:01 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
I was also considering running a domain controller in a virtual
server.
Has anybody tried this?
Bruce Butler
IT Manager
Knappe & Koester, Inc.
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
Of Michael Barry
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:13 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
These numbers of fairly consistent with GSX since it relies upon
a host
OS
and doesn't support SMP. If you were to evaluate ESX with SMP
extensions
the performance would be within about 10% of native. That being
said,
both
Intel and AMD are building virtualization support into their
next
generation
CPU's which should all but eliminate any performance difference
between
solutions like ESX and native. In the meantime, you're right
that it's
great for test environments, especially being able to do instant
provisioning and patch roll-back.
Michael
Michael Barry
Aspacia Systems Inc
866.566.9600
312.803.0730 fax
http://www.aspacia.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
Of
Bob Booth
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:53 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
We tried to put progress database on a virtual server, but we
did, we
saw a
significant performance decrease.
We did some testing on a brand new server - proliant dl385 -2
duel
core opteron 9 gig of ram - shelf of 14 15k disk drives
We installed VM on the box - and progress as a virtual server -
MRP
took 8 minutes to run
We install progress db directly on the box - Mrp took 3
minutes to
run - and if I ran it directly on the server as a client 1
minute.
VMware makes sense only if you are willing to give up the
performance (I
was
not) . We are using VMware for all of our other windows
servers.
It would be great for test environments!
Bob Booth
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
Of
Comeau, Steven
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 12:42 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
Actually,
At Perspectives, I did see Epicor using VMWare with V8, but I
believe
there
were some performance issues. I am not sure if they were using
ESX or
GSX.
I would ask their recommendations or others here who may have
that
knowledge.
Steven Comeau
Manager, Corporate IT Systems
Main Tape
1 Capital Drive, Suite 101
Cranbury, NJ 08512
800-718-8273 x332
_____
From: Michael Barry [mailto:mbarry@...]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 12:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
Another option that has yet to be mentioned is to install V8 on
your
production V6 system within a Virtual Server from either VMWare,
Microsoft,
Topspin or Free VPS. Virtuals are far more cost effective than
a
hardware
solution and once you have completed your migration, testing,
modifications,
etc., all you have to do is transfer the data to the physical
box and
your
conversion is done.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
Of
Brian Stenglein
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:56 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
So you didn't experience any conflicts having both versions
running on
the
same server at the same time?
Brian
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Comeau, Steven" <scomeau@m...>
wrote:
used it
felt
with or
top of
of
be
Bruce Butler
IT Manager
Knappe & Koester, Inc.
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Comeau, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:36 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
* Bruce,
You may wish to ask this to the Active Directory mailing list -
these
guys are top notch in the world (http://activedir.org
<http://activedir.org/> ). Join up and search their archives
and ask as
I am sure they have done this and have real world experience.
From what
I have seen, some even virtualized Exchange, but large
bridgehead
servers are not done (at least not yet).
Steven Comeau
Manager, Corporate IT Systems
Main Tape
1 Capital Drive, Suite 101
Cranbury, NJ 08512
800-718-8273 x332
_____
From: Bruce Butler [mailto:bbutler@...]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 6:01 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
I was also considering running a domain controller in a virtual
server.
Has anybody tried this?
Bruce Butler
IT Manager
Knappe & Koester, Inc.
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
Of Michael Barry
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:13 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
These numbers of fairly consistent with GSX since it relies upon
a host
OS
and doesn't support SMP. If you were to evaluate ESX with SMP
extensions
the performance would be within about 10% of native. That being
said,
both
Intel and AMD are building virtualization support into their
next
generation
CPU's which should all but eliminate any performance difference
between
solutions like ESX and native. In the meantime, you're right
that it's
great for test environments, especially being able to do instant
provisioning and patch roll-back.
Michael
Michael Barry
Aspacia Systems Inc
866.566.9600
312.803.0730 fax
http://www.aspacia.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
Of
Bob Booth
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:53 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
We tried to put progress database on a virtual server, but we
did, we
saw a
significant performance decrease.
We did some testing on a brand new server - proliant dl385 -2
duel
core opteron 9 gig of ram - shelf of 14 15k disk drives
We installed VM on the box - and progress as a virtual server -
MRP
took 8 minutes to run
We install progress db directly on the box - Mrp took 3
minutes to
run - and if I ran it directly on the server as a client 1
minute.
VMware makes sense only if you are willing to give up the
performance (I
was
not) . We are using VMware for all of our other windows
servers.
It would be great for test environments!
Bob Booth
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
Of
Comeau, Steven
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 12:42 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
Actually,
At Perspectives, I did see Epicor using VMWare with V8, but I
believe
there
were some performance issues. I am not sure if they were using
ESX or
GSX.
I would ask their recommendations or others here who may have
that
knowledge.
Steven Comeau
Manager, Corporate IT Systems
Main Tape
1 Capital Drive, Suite 101
Cranbury, NJ 08512
800-718-8273 x332
_____
From: Michael Barry [mailto:mbarry@...]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 12:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
Another option that has yet to be mentioned is to install V8 on
your
production V6 system within a Virtual Server from either VMWare,
Microsoft,
Topspin or Free VPS. Virtuals are far more cost effective than
a
hardware
solution and once you have completed your migration, testing,
modifications,
etc., all you have to do is transfer the data to the physical
box and
your
conversion is done.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf
Of
Brian Stenglein
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:56 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: V8 Upgrade Question
So you didn't experience any conflicts having both versions
running on
the
same server at the same time?
Brian
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Comeau, Steven" <scomeau@m...>
wrote:
>ready
> Actually, we purchased a server for V8, but when 8 wasn't
used it
> for V6 until it was ready. We used both 6 and 8 on the sameserver, but
> we were a smaller shop using both 6 and 8 (20 users max).Once we
felt
> comfortable that 6 was no longer needed (100% sure all datawas
> transferred), we uninstalled it.seen
>
>
>
> Our server is a dual 2.8GHz (Hyperthreaded - no performance
with or
> without), 3 Gig RAM, 100G - RAID 10 for data, Dual Gig NICs -not
top of
> the line, but up there. V6 went like lightening, V8 is muchslower, but
> it is also more client intensive.the
>
>
>
> Steven Comeau
>
> Manager, Corporate IT Systems
>
> Main Tape
>
> 1 Capital Drive, Suite 101
>
> Cranbury, NJ 08512
>
> 800-718-8273 x332
>
> _____
>
> From: Brian Stenglein [mailto:bstenglein@c...]
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 11:04 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] V8 Upgrade Question
>
>
>
> A Question for those of you who have taken the leap or are in
> process of taking the leap to 8.0.using
>
> Are you Testing/Implementing on a brand new server or are you
> your Vanatage 6.X Production Server for testing andimplementation
of
> 8.0?test and
>
> I had been assuming that we would purchase a new Server to
> implement 8.0, but my boss is now considering upgrading ourexisting
> server and using that instead.should not
>
> Has anyone else gone this route? Are there reasons this
be
> done or is it just no big deal?[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> Thanks for any comments.
>
> Brian Stenglein
> Clow Stamping Co.
>