Interestingly enough, we were slated to go live in 2009 but pushed our project off until 2011 (may not even happen then). We figured, why renew when we aren't doing anything with the software?
Â
We were told that when we decided to finallly "go live", they would back bill us for maintenance contracts.
Â
It may be the deciding factor in going with another software since we aren't so far invested that we can't pull the "cash cow" plug now!
Â
Elaina Gallagher
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Gloucester Engineering Co., Inc.
Â
We were told that when we decided to finallly "go live", they would back bill us for maintenance contracts.
Â
It may be the deciding factor in going with another software since we aren't so far invested that we can't pull the "cash cow" plug now!
Â
Elaina Gallagher
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Gloucester Engineering Co., Inc.
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Dines, Tim <tdines@...> wrote:
From: Dines, Tim <tdines@...>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Skipping Maintenance Renewal
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 11:19 AM
Â
I agree with this. It makes for a huge kick in the wallet if you have
to go back and pay for a year that you did not use.
Tim Dines
Information Technology
Steel Parts Manufacturing, Inc.
801 Berryman Pike
Tipton, IN 46072
Direct: 765-675-5201
Cell: 765-437-1402
From: vantage@yahoogroups .com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com] On Behalf
Of Todd Caughey
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:02 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Skipping Maintenance Renewal
I believe the maintenance prices are a set formula based on current list
price per seat for the base and add-on modules X number of seats X
either (I think) 15% (legacy) or 18%. 3rd party modules are always the
higher rate. If you have a lot of full seats and a lot of add-on modules
it multiplies the maintenance cost pretty fast. We got to $28K for 33
full and 14 DC and choked. It is the per seat multiplier effect that
really skews things. This isn't MS-Office at $400 cost per seat.
For large systems like this a strictly per seat model becomes a great
disincentive for more seats. Just a SWAG but I suspect there are some
natural customer size breakpoints for setting up a tiered pricing
systems that are not as punitive of growth. The relationship between
their support and R&D costs and number is seats is not linear but that's
the way it is treated because it is a cash cow for Epicor. For us the
value part was way too far out of balance to continue being milked.
-Todd C.
____________ _________ _________ __
From: vantage@yahoogroups .com <mailto:vantage% 40yahoogroups. com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com <mailto:vantage% 40yahoogroups. com> ] On
Behalf Of Chris Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:56 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com <mailto:vantage% 40yahoogroups. com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Skipping Maintenance Renewal
How much!?!?
Theres no wonder people think about stopping it at that price!
____________ _________ _________ __
From: xorone <xorone@yahoo. com <mailto:xorone% 40yahoo.com>
<mailto:xorone% 40yahoo.com> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com <mailto:vantage% 40yahoogroups. com>
<mailto:vantage% 40yahoogroups. com>
Sent: Tue, 26 January, 2010 8:47:36
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Skipping Maintenance Renewal
our annual contract is ~$16,000 for 11 full & 10 data licenses.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]