Why not add Operation 031 to do the operation 20 rework, then add
operation 032 to do the operation 30 rework. The rule being all
operations not ending in a zero are rework and easily identifiable.
Hope this helps.
Patrick Winter
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mike Tsoi
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 3:29 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] What's the best way to keep track and handle "Rework"
Operations ini Vantage?
Let's say we have a job assembly ABC that having 5 operations in
sequence. They are Opr 10; Opr 20; Opr 30; Opr 40 and Opr 50. We
require to produce qty 1000pcs for ABC and start from Opr 10. The
Qty/Parent between each operations are 1:1. Each of the operation are
to be done in difference work center (wc).
Assumed that we report completed qty for Opr 10, Opr 20, and Opr30
1000pcs. When the production labor go to start to do Opr 40, they
found that the WIP was bad and require to go back Opr 20 to rework.
In this case, what we have to do in Vantage in order to:
1.) Send the WIP (Completed by Opr30) of 1000 back to Opr 20 for rework?
2.) Tell Opr 20's work center that there is a 1000qty WIP, returned
from Opr 40, requiring to be rework by Opr 20?
3.) Keep track the WIP transaction history? For example:
Opr 40's wc returned 1000 WIP Qty to Opr 20's wc for rework on date
XX-XX-XX.
Opr 20's wc reworked 1000 and pass to Opr 30's wc on date XX-XX-XX.
Opr 30's wc reworked 1000 and pass to Opr 40's wc on date XX-XX-XX.
Do anyone has experience or idea on it?
I am not considering to use "Rework Activities" as it keep track for
rework time only, but not the WIP qty and its movement.
Thank you.
Regards,
Mike
TTG
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this
e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this
information by a person other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized and may be illegal.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
operation 032 to do the operation 30 rework. The rule being all
operations not ending in a zero are rework and easily identifiable.
Hope this helps.
Patrick Winter
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mike Tsoi
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 3:29 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] What's the best way to keep track and handle "Rework"
Operations ini Vantage?
Let's say we have a job assembly ABC that having 5 operations in
sequence. They are Opr 10; Opr 20; Opr 30; Opr 40 and Opr 50. We
require to produce qty 1000pcs for ABC and start from Opr 10. The
Qty/Parent between each operations are 1:1. Each of the operation are
to be done in difference work center (wc).
Assumed that we report completed qty for Opr 10, Opr 20, and Opr30
1000pcs. When the production labor go to start to do Opr 40, they
found that the WIP was bad and require to go back Opr 20 to rework.
In this case, what we have to do in Vantage in order to:
1.) Send the WIP (Completed by Opr30) of 1000 back to Opr 20 for rework?
2.) Tell Opr 20's work center that there is a 1000qty WIP, returned
from Opr 40, requiring to be rework by Opr 20?
3.) Keep track the WIP transaction history? For example:
Opr 40's wc returned 1000 WIP Qty to Opr 20's wc for rework on date
XX-XX-XX.
Opr 20's wc reworked 1000 and pass to Opr 30's wc on date XX-XX-XX.
Opr 30's wc reworked 1000 and pass to Opr 40's wc on date XX-XX-XX.
Do anyone has experience or idea on it?
I am not considering to use "Rework Activities" as it keep track for
rework time only, but not the WIP qty and its movement.
Thank you.
Regards,
Mike
TTG
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this
e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this
information by a person other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized and may be illegal.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]