Please study up on the backflush transaction hierarchy, this will help you setup the system and prevent some issues.
there are a few posts on the forum related to this.
Issuing manually will almost certainly be more accurate but more time consuming
Backflushing will be less accurate (depending on many factors) but require no time spent issuing manually.
IMO this is the main point to consider when making this decision. How accurate do I want to be vs how much time it takes to achieve that accuracy.
Some gotchas:
If you use or want to use lot control, backflushing is not an option for the parts that are lot controlled.
If you leverage the āNegative Quantity Actionā functionality on a part class, backflushing blows right past this and will take you negative anyway.
Backflushing is GREAT for instances where you know that you are consuming inventory at a very stable rateā¦ for example, when you make 1 bicycle, you KNOW that you are using one frame, one handlebar, one seat, and two wheel assembliesā¦
BUT. Can you guarantee that the person doing the assembly picked up the right wheel assembly? If you can, then again, backflushing is great.
but i have seen instances where pre-kitting the materials works better and gives much cleaner results, because you KNOW what was issued, and the mfg team cannot accidently pick up the wrong screw/bolt/nut when assembling.
Also know that when you backflush, that your inventory is always suspectā¦ the system SAYS you consumed it, but did you really? OR the system doesnt say you consumed something, but it was put into the assembly, and the operation has not been marked ācompleteā yet, so the backflush has not taken place yet. This can cause challenges with Cycle Counting because the timing of the backflushing is always at the end of the operation.