@MLamkin, did you ever find a solution for this? Can Report BAQs have a relationship in RDDs?
I am in a similar situation where we may want Bill To information to appear on the Sales Order Acknowledgement as opposed to Sold To information.
I submitted a help ticket and was told to submit an Improvement Suggestion. Below is what I was looking for help with. Perhaps there is another way to accomplish this.
In the OrderAck Report Data Definition, the order header has many calculated fields, but it is rather confusing on the following:
Calc_BillToAddressList (this is the sold to address list)
Calc_BillToContact (this is the sold to contact)
Calc_BTAddressList (this is the bill to address list)
Epicor has many calculated fields for the ship to:
Calc_ShipToAddressList
Calc_ShipToContact
Calc_ShipToEmail
Calc_ShipToFax
Calc_ShipToPhone
The following calculated fields print the Sold To information, not Bill To information. What does the Prc mean?
Calc_PrcEmail
Calc_PrcFax
Calc_PrcPhone
I wish Epicor explained how each of the calculated fields are calculated.
When Epicor has fields displayed on a record, but they are not Database fields, it would be nice if Epicor would add those fields as Calculated Fields.
Like if Epicor would add the following (for the Bill To, not the Sold To), it would make things easier.
Calc_BTContact (Bill to Contact Name)
Calc_BTEmail (Bill to Email)
Calc_BTFax (Bill To Fax number)
Calc_BTPhone (Bill to Phone number)
Then we could determine what to display on our Order Acknowledgements.