Version 405 upgrade

Yahoo Archive
1
It fixes some flaws in 404B.  We went straight from 6.1 to 8.03.403. But if I could do it all over again... we would have never upgraded from 6.1 to 8.
Â
chris

--- On Mon, 7/14/08, wecowidow <rob140@...> wrote:

From: wecowidow <rob140@...>
Subject: [Vantage] Version 405 upgrade
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, July 14, 2008, 4:15 PM






Has anyone upgraded to 405 yet? If you have, what are your thoughts?
I'm trying to decide if I should spend the time testing it if their are
still quite a few problems. I don't have many customizations other
than visual changes so it would be an "out of the box" use.


















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
Has anyone upgraded to 405 yet? If you have, what are your thoughts?
I'm trying to decide if I should spend the time testing it if their are
still quite a few problems. I don't have many customizations other
than visual changes so it would be an "out of the box" use.
3
Don't take this the wrong way, but search the messages.
This has been discussed several times in the last few weeks, and even as
late as this morning by myself.
Aaron Hoyt
Vantage Plastics

wecowidow wrote:
>
> Has anyone upgraded to 405 yet? If you have, what are your thoughts?
> I'm trying to decide if I should spend the time testing it if their are
> still quite a few problems. I don't have many customizations other
> than visual changes so it would be an "out of the box" use.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4
I saw what was written concerning Sales Order Entry and Shipment being
a little awkward. I did a search on 405 and didn't come up with much.
That was the reason for the post. What would be good keywords to
search to come up with more answers that you say are out there? I
don't want to have people repeat themselves, but all the searches I did
came up pretty limited.
5
We are having a problem with the stock status not including the
Standard Material Burden Cost. Epicor said that this is not happening
in their database.

They have a copy of our database. Our support engineer said that this
must be related to our data import (Which was done by Epicor). I added
a test part and this is happening to new parts as well.

I haven't been able to determine exactly what is going on, but it
appears that a receipt transaction does not include the value of the
material burden.

Is this working correctly for everyone else?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "wecowidow" <rob140@...> wrote:
>
> I saw what was written concerning Sales Order Entry and Shipment
being
> a little awkward. I did a search on 405 and didn't come up with
much.
> That was the reason for the post. What would be good keywords to
> search to come up with more answers that you say are out there? I
> don't want to have people repeat themselves, but all the searches I
did
> came up pretty limited.
>