Allen,
The problem in our case was that revision A of the assembly had part 1
reporting to part 2.
Revision B attempted to correct that by having part 2 report to part 1.
Separately, each revision the BOM looked sound, but apparently Vantage
saw that part 1 was linked to part 2 which was linked to part 1, thereby
causing the "circular reference" when we tried to check in this rev (as
a side note, revision A remained approved).
The only way we could eliminate the problem was to un-approve revision A
and remove part 2 from the revision A BOM structure. Things ran fine
after the fix.
Good Luck,
Mark L. Knight, CPIM
Master Scheduler
Picometrix, LLC (an API company)
2925 Boardwalk
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Phone: 734-864-5675
Fax: 734-998-3474
mknight@... <mailto:mknight@...>
This transmission contains information belonging to Picometrix and is
confidential and/or legally privileged under all Non-Disclosure
Agreements in place between Picometrix and the recipient. The
information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that disclosing, distributing or copying this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact the
sender named above.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Allen Tucker
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 7:29 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] V6.0 Bom Refuses to check in form Engineering
Workbench
I suspected the same thing. The BOM that won't check in consists of 1
assembly and a line drawing. The subassembly BOM checks in although it
takes hours. That subassembly consists of 9 materials and 4
subassemblies all of which check in. I haven't found any circular
references and all subassemblies validate.
I'm sure that there is something wrong in the BOM but don't know where
else to look.
Allen Tucker
IT Vantage Manager
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.
Email: atucker@... <mailto:atucker%40espey.com>
PH: 518-245-4252
Fax: 518-245-4421
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ]On
Behalf Of Mark L. Knight
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:54 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] V6.0 Bom Refuses to check in form Engineering
Workbench
We had a similar problem a few months ago. It turned out to be a
circular reference on the BOM (a BOM part that calls itself out as a
component). The process would run for a long period, then it would
crash.
Check the current revision as well as any older, yet still approved
revisions.
Mark L. Knight, CPIM
Master Scheduler
Picometrix, LLC (an API company)
2925 Boardwalk
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Phone: 734-864-5675
Fax: 734-998-3474
mknight@... <mailto:mknight%40picometrix.com>
<mailto:mknight%40picometrix.com> <mailto:mknight@...
<mailto:mknight%40picometrix.com> <mailto:mknight%40picometrix.com>>
This transmission contains information belonging to Picometrix and is
confidential and/or legally privileged under all Non-Disclosure
Agreements in place between Picometrix and the recipient. The
information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that disclosing, distributing or copying this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact the
sender named above.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>]
On Behalf
Of apt876sp1
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:42 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] V6.0 Bom Refuses to check in form Engineering
Workbench
We have a bom that refuses to finish checking from Engineering
Workbench. I have let the proces run for at least 24 hours. We have been
in contact with Epicor and have followed there suggestions to add -s
20000 and -inp 32000 to our startup.pf
Epicor has asked for the DB but the FTP transfer crashes after 20
minutes.
I'm lookig for suggestions on correcting the problem or what the issue
might be for uploaading the DB.
Thank in advance
Allen Tucker
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.
PH 518-245-4252
atucker@... <mailto:atucker%40espey.com>
<mailto:atucker%40espey.com> <mailto:atucker%40espey.com>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________
The information contained in this message is intended solely for the
individual it is specifically and originally addressed. This message and
its contents may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure or distribution, or taking any action in reliance on the
content of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this
message in error, please delete it from any computer and notify the
sender. If you suspect that this message may have been altered, please
notify the sender.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The problem in our case was that revision A of the assembly had part 1
reporting to part 2.
Revision B attempted to correct that by having part 2 report to part 1.
Separately, each revision the BOM looked sound, but apparently Vantage
saw that part 1 was linked to part 2 which was linked to part 1, thereby
causing the "circular reference" when we tried to check in this rev (as
a side note, revision A remained approved).
The only way we could eliminate the problem was to un-approve revision A
and remove part 2 from the revision A BOM structure. Things ran fine
after the fix.
Good Luck,
Mark L. Knight, CPIM
Master Scheduler
Picometrix, LLC (an API company)
2925 Boardwalk
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Phone: 734-864-5675
Fax: 734-998-3474
mknight@... <mailto:mknight@...>
This transmission contains information belonging to Picometrix and is
confidential and/or legally privileged under all Non-Disclosure
Agreements in place between Picometrix and the recipient. The
information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that disclosing, distributing or copying this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact the
sender named above.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Allen Tucker
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 7:29 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] V6.0 Bom Refuses to check in form Engineering
Workbench
I suspected the same thing. The BOM that won't check in consists of 1
assembly and a line drawing. The subassembly BOM checks in although it
takes hours. That subassembly consists of 9 materials and 4
subassemblies all of which check in. I haven't found any circular
references and all subassemblies validate.
I'm sure that there is something wrong in the BOM but don't know where
else to look.
Allen Tucker
IT Vantage Manager
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.
Email: atucker@... <mailto:atucker%40espey.com>
PH: 518-245-4252
Fax: 518-245-4421
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ]On
Behalf Of Mark L. Knight
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:54 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] V6.0 Bom Refuses to check in form Engineering
Workbench
We had a similar problem a few months ago. It turned out to be a
circular reference on the BOM (a BOM part that calls itself out as a
component). The process would run for a long period, then it would
crash.
Check the current revision as well as any older, yet still approved
revisions.
Mark L. Knight, CPIM
Master Scheduler
Picometrix, LLC (an API company)
2925 Boardwalk
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Phone: 734-864-5675
Fax: 734-998-3474
mknight@... <mailto:mknight%40picometrix.com>
<mailto:mknight%40picometrix.com> <mailto:mknight@...
<mailto:mknight%40picometrix.com> <mailto:mknight%40picometrix.com>>
This transmission contains information belonging to Picometrix and is
confidential and/or legally privileged under all Non-Disclosure
Agreements in place between Picometrix and the recipient. The
information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that disclosing, distributing or copying this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact the
sender named above.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>]
On Behalf
Of apt876sp1
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:42 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] V6.0 Bom Refuses to check in form Engineering
Workbench
We have a bom that refuses to finish checking from Engineering
Workbench. I have let the proces run for at least 24 hours. We have been
in contact with Epicor and have followed there suggestions to add -s
20000 and -inp 32000 to our startup.pf
Epicor has asked for the DB but the FTP transfer crashes after 20
minutes.
I'm lookig for suggestions on correcting the problem or what the issue
might be for uploaading the DB.
Thank in advance
Allen Tucker
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.
PH 518-245-4252
atucker@... <mailto:atucker%40espey.com>
<mailto:atucker%40espey.com> <mailto:atucker%40espey.com>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________
The information contained in this message is intended solely for the
individual it is specifically and originally addressed. This message and
its contents may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure or distribution, or taking any action in reliance on the
content of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this
message in error, please delete it from any computer and notify the
sender. If you suspect that this message may have been altered, please
notify the sender.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]