(unknown)

Yahoo Archive
21
Paul,

They were able to duplicate my problem of searching by Product Group.

They were not able to dubplicate the latency after selecting a job after
browse.

They are on patch 513 however so this problem may be fixed in that
patch.



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Lipham [mailto:pml@...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 12:03 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1.512


Thanks John!! At least I know it's not just our setup.

Jeremy you crack me up... I wonder what other enhancements they have?
I
needed that!

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: John Whitlow [mailto:jwhitlow@...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:50 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1.512


Paul,

I just tested and can confirm your problem.

I am calling into support now.



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Lipham [mailto:pml@...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:31 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1.512


Just wanted to update you guys on the Production Detail report lockup.
We
finally realized if we would wait about 30 to 45 seconds after searching
for
a job and selecting it the program would finally respond and you could
print
the report. They have had us do all kinds of performance tuning to the
progress setup and make changes to the client setup as well. Nothing
has
worked and now they want to see the database.

Everything else in the database runs really fast on the new server. I
don't
think they can say the server or workstations do not have enough punch
to
get the job done.

If anyone else is having this problem it might be good to contact
Vantage
support just to let them know the problem isn't isolated.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
Yahoo! Groups Links
22
I just tested selecting by product group. It was very slow and gave an
error " REPLACE/CONCAT may not result in data > 32000 bytes" for every job
it pulled in from that product group. After that I went back in to select
another group and my computer locked for about five minutes. After that I
received all the "REPLACE/CONCAT" errors again. Nuts??

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: John Whitlow [mailto:jwhitlow@...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:00 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1.512


How about if you click By Product Group?

I just tested this and the screen goes dead and you can see all the jobs
by that product group scroll sporadically.

Vantage locks up and you have no choice but to close out.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Lipham [mailto:pml@...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:31 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1.512


Just wanted to update you guys on the Production Detail report lockup.
We
finally realized if we would wait about 30 to 45 seconds after searching
for
a job and selecting it the program would finally respond and you could
print
the report. They have had us do all kinds of performance tuning to the
progress setup and make changes to the client setup as well. Nothing
has
worked and now they want to see the database.

Everything else in the database runs really fast on the new server. I
don't
think they can say the server or workstations do not have enough punch
to
get the job done.

If anyone else is having this problem it might be good to contact
Vantage
support just to let them know the problem isn't isolated.

-----Original Message-----
From: PLAMAN DICK [mailto:dick.plaman@...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 9:47 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1


We just migrated to Vantage 6.0.524. Most everything works as
expected...except the Production
Detail locks up the user when browsing for a job. Epicor states that
this problem is unique to
our install. They say that they cannot reproduce it.







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.>
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links>
Yahoo! Groups Links







Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.>
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links>



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129kj9ugf/M=298184.5285298.6392945.3001176/D=gr
oups/S=1705007183:HM/EXP=1092844853/A=2164331/R=0/SIG=11eaelai9/*http://www.
netflix.com/Default?mqso=60183351> click here

<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=298184.5285298.6392945.3001176/D=groups/S=
:HM/A=2164331/rand=233784211>


_____

Yahoo! Groups Links


* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/>


* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vantage-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:vantage-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
23
Does any one have a quick way to get a list of what a person's access is
in Vantage.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
24
There is (or was anyway) a security.prl for a Report Builder report that would show this - downloadable from the Vantage support downloads area.
-Todd C.


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Geary, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:32 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1



Does any one have a quick way to get a list of what a person's access is
in Vantage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
25
We don't have report builder. I think I created one using access if it
is accurate and complete. I used the security file. I see that is what
you suggested using. So it should be right... right?



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Todd Caughey
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:46 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1



There is (or was anyway) a security.prl for a Report Builder report that
would show this - downloadable from the Vantage support downloads area.
-Todd C.


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ]On
Behalf Of Geary, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:32 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1

Does any one have a quick way to get a list of what a person's access is
in Vantage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


This message has been processed via your triumphgroup.com e-mail
address.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
26
Yes, that should do it. The RB report I have is a bit more complciated because it links and re-links Security and Menu tables via several layers of alias versions of those tables in order to portray how deeply in a menu tree which groups have access to. There is then a seperate report for who is in a group. But the Security table is the basis.
-Todd C.


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Geary, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:11 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1



We don't have report builder. I think I created one using access if it
is accurate and complete. I used the security file. I see that is what
you suggested using. So it should be right... right?

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com [mailto: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On Behalf
Of Todd Caughey
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:46 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1

There is (or was anyway) a security.prl for a Report Builder report that
would show this - downloadable from the Vantage support downloads area.
-Todd C.

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ]On
Behalf Of Geary, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:32 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1

Does any one have a quick way to get a list of what a person's access is
in Vantage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This message has been processed via your triumphgroup.com e-mail
address.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
27
Since you use Access, here is a query I use for a summary report of my
users:

SELECT PUB_UserFile.Name, PUB_UserFile.Phone, PUB_UserFile.GroupList,
PUB_UserFile.UserDisabled, PUB_UserFile.OfficePhone,
PUB_UserFile.PwdExpiresDays, PUB_UserFile.PwdLastChanged,
PUB_UserFile.SecurityMgr, PUB_UserFile.CanChangePassword,
PUB_UserFile.AllowMultipleSessions,
PUB_UserFile.CustomizationPrivileges, PUB_UserFile.AllowReq
FROM PUB_UserFile;

Butch

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Geary, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:11 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1



We don't have report builder. I think I created one using access if it
is accurate and complete. I used the security file. I see that is what
you suggested using. So it should be right... right?

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of Todd Caughey
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:46 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1

There is (or was anyway) a security.prl for a Report Builder report that
would show this - downloadable from the Vantage support downloads area.
-Todd C.

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ]On
Behalf Of Geary, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:32 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1

Does any one have a quick way to get a list of what a person's access is
in Vantage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This message has been processed via your triumphgroup.com e-mail
address.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
28
Great thanks!



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Todd Caughey
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 5:01 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1



Yes, that should do it. The RB report I have is a bit more complciated
because it links and re-links Security and Menu tables via several
layers of alias versions of those tables in order to portray how deeply
in a menu tree which groups have access to. There is then a seperate
report for who is in a group. But the Security table is the basis.
-Todd C.


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ]On
Behalf Of Geary, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:11 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1

We don't have report builder. I think I created one using access if it
is accurate and complete. I used the security file. I see that is what
you suggested using. So it should be right... right?

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf
Of Todd Caughey
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:46 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1

There is (or was anyway) a security.prl for a Report Builder report that
would show this - downloadable from the Vantage support downloads area.
-Todd C.

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ]On
Behalf Of Geary, Stephanie
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:32 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Vantage 6.1

Does any one have a quick way to get a list of what a person's access is
in Vantage.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This message has been processed via your triumphgroup.com e-mail
address.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


This message has been processed via your triumphgroup.com e-mail
address.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
29
Hey everyone,

I'm trying to get away from an offline excel based WIP process, and use the
WIP / COS functionality.

We've gotten more disciplined with completing transactions for qty, but are
not capturing labor detail precisely enough to use detail.

What I'd like to do is to use qty completed x est labor hours = labor value
in the WIP.

What it looks like the function does is actual labor hours (as captured on
the floor) = labor value in the WIP.

Anyone invented this wheel before?


- Alexander



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
30
Hi,

You could use Backflushing depending on your environment. But I
would think the main focus would be getting the hours booked
correctly but in some environments backflushing is the only feasible
way.


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Alexander Gamble" <alexanderg@...>
wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm trying to get away from an offline excel based WIP process,
and use the
> WIP / COS functionality.
>
> We've gotten more disciplined with completing transactions for
qty, but are
> not capturing labor detail precisely enough to use detail.
>
> What I'd like to do is to use qty completed x est labor hours =
labor value
> in the WIP.
>
> What it looks like the function does is actual labor hours (as
captured on
> the floor) = labor value in the WIP.
>
> Anyone invented this wheel before?
>
>
> - Alexander
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
31
Bryan,

Thought about that. If I use backflush the system has no other choice but to
use a std for labor, but.... if I have three steps, each of which adds 1/3 of
the value, and I've got the part at step two - I want to know I have 66% of
the value.

Do you know what happens if I select qty only instead of backflush?


- Alexander


________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
brychanwilliams
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:44 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: [ Vantage 6.1] WIP / COS at standard rather than
actual???



Hi,

You could use Backflushing depending on your environment. But I
would think the main focus would be getting the hours booked
correctly but in some environments backflushing is the only feasible
way.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Alexander Gamble" <alexanderg@...>
wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm trying to get away from an offline excel based WIP process,
and use the
> WIP / COS functionality.
>
> We've gotten more disciplined with completing transactions for
qty, but are
> not capturing labor detail precisely enough to use detail.
>
> What I'd like to do is to use qty completed x est labor hours =
labor value
> in the WIP.
>
> What it looks like the function does is actual labor hours (as
captured on
> the floor) = labor value in the WIP.
>
> Anyone invented this wheel before?
>
>
> - Alexander
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
32
Sorry that was what I meant, back flush the labour not the whole job.
I take it you mean three operations when referring to steps. Use
quantity only , this will assume the prod std hours when the qty is
booked.


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Alexander Gamble" <alexanderg@...>
wrote:
>
> Bryan,
>
> Thought about that. If I use backflush the system has no other
choice but to
> use a std for labor, but.... if I have three steps, each of which
adds 1/3 of
> the value, and I've got the part at step two - I want to know I
have 66% of
> the value.
>
> Do you know what happens if I select qty only instead of backflush?
>
>
> - Alexander
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of
> brychanwilliams
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:44 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: [ Vantage 6.1] WIP / COS at standard rather
than
> actual???
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You could use Backflushing depending on your environment. But I
> would think the main focus would be getting the hours booked
> correctly but in some environments backflushing is the only
feasible
> way.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Alexander Gamble" <alexanderg@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I'm trying to get away from an offline excel based WIP process,
> and use the
> > WIP / COS functionality.
> >
> > We've gotten more disciplined with completing transactions for
> qty, but are
> > not capturing labor detail precisely enough to use detail.
> >
> > What I'd like to do is to use qty completed x est labor hours =
> labor value
> > in the WIP.
> >
> > What it looks like the function does is actual labor hours (as
> captured on
> > the floor) = labor value in the WIP.
> >
> > Anyone invented this wheel before?
> >
> >
> > - Alexander
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
33
Yes, I mean operations.

Thanks - appreciate it.


- Alexander


________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
brychanwilliams
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 4:25 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: [ Vantage 6.1] WIP / COS at standard rather than
actual???



Sorry that was what I meant, back flush the labour not the whole job.
I take it you mean three operations when referring to steps. Use
quantity only , this will assume the prod std hours when the qty is
booked.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Alexander Gamble" <alexanderg@...>
wrote:
>
> Bryan,
>
> Thought about that. If I use backflush the system has no other
choice but to
> use a std for labor, but.... if I have three steps, each of which
adds 1/3 of
> the value, and I've got the part at step two - I want to know I
have 66% of
> the value.
>
> Do you know what happens if I select qty only instead of backflush?
>
>
> - Alexander
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
> brychanwilliams
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:44 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: [ Vantage 6.1] WIP / COS at standard rather
than
> actual???
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You could use Backflushing depending on your environment. But I
> would think the main focus would be getting the hours booked
> correctly but in some environments backflushing is the only
feasible
> way.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Alexander Gamble" <alexanderg@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I'm trying to get away from an offline excel based WIP process,
> and use the
> > WIP / COS functionality.
> >
> > We've gotten more disciplined with completing transactions for
> qty, but are
> > not capturing labor detail precisely enough to use detail.
> >
> > What I'd like to do is to use qty completed x est labor hours =
> labor value
> > in the WIP.
> >
> > What it looks like the function does is actual labor hours (as
> captured on
> > the floor) = labor value in the WIP.
> >
> > Anyone invented this wheel before?
> >
> >
> > - Alexander
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]