Hello Dick
We currently use the set-up recommended by epicor Gateway, TIM1B, and TT5's.
My biggest hurdle was the employee culture shock.
We've gone from paper-based, no checking, to a full-blown DC system. Some
employees threatened to quit if they had to use the system (in fact, one
did). Comments ranged from "Why should I", to "Big brother syndrome".
The dust has now settled and tidying up the DC Error Log a couple of times a
day is about it. The system in v4 seems pretty solid. After all the
histrionics of implementation, screaming, blood and teeth it's now me that's
shaky.
HTH Chris Reed
PWSL
We currently use the set-up recommended by epicor Gateway, TIM1B, and TT5's.
My biggest hurdle was the employee culture shock.
We've gone from paper-based, no checking, to a full-blown DC system. Some
employees threatened to quit if they had to use the system (in fact, one
did). Comments ranged from "Why should I", to "Big brother syndrome".
The dust has now settled and tidying up the DC Error Log a couple of times a
day is about it. The system in v4 seems pretty solid. After all the
histrionics of implementation, screaming, blood and teeth it's now me that's
shaky.
HTH Chris Reed
PWSL
----- Original Message -----
From: Plaman Dick <dick.plaman@...>
To: <vantage@egroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 2:16 PM
Subject: [Vantage] TT5's
> Two years ago, we attempted to implement TT5's in our manufacturing
> environment. Because of a variety of
> reasons, we aborted this attempt and instead went to mouse and keyboard.
> I like the concept of the TT5's,
> and am wondering if anyone is currently using them, and if so, have the
> problems associated with them been
> resolved? Particularly, has error trapping (at the input device) been
> remedied , and how difficult was it for users
> to adjust to their use? I thank you for your attention.