Sounds like you need to write a report to handle this. If only one
employee working setup on an operation, I would try an RB report with
Labordtl -> Joboper. Group on Labordtl.employeenum, Labordtl.jobnum,
Labordtl.assemblyseq, and then labordtl.oprseq. Try comparing
Joboper.EstSetHrs to an aggregate of hours worked on each operation's
setup (labordtl.labortype = "S"). Use the same report to calculate
production efficiency (labordtl.labortype = "P").
It would get complicated if more than one employee per operation
setup. Splitting production efficiency is fairly simple since you
have a quantity produced, hours worked and an expected quantity per
hour. There is a field in Labordtl called SetupPctComplete which may
be helpful in this scenario. Good luck.
Lonnie
employee working setup on an operation, I would try an RB report with
Labordtl -> Joboper. Group on Labordtl.employeenum, Labordtl.jobnum,
Labordtl.assemblyseq, and then labordtl.oprseq. Try comparing
Joboper.EstSetHrs to an aggregate of hours worked on each operation's
setup (labordtl.labortype = "S"). Use the same report to calculate
production efficiency (labordtl.labortype = "P").
It would get complicated if more than one employee per operation
setup. Splitting production efficiency is fairly simple since you
have a quantity produced, hours worked and an expected quantity per
hour. There is a field in Labordtl called SetupPctComplete which may
be helpful in this scenario. Good luck.
Lonnie
--- In vantage@y..., "Peter McGuire" <pmcguire@l...> wrote:
> We are in the process of developing an incentive plan for our
production
> employees. The dilemma I have is how to handle Setup hours & setup
> efficiency. I would like to use the workcenter efficiency report to
do this
> without getting into an administrative nightmare.
> Vantage takes the hours reported PER DAY against the setup standard
to
> determine the efficiency of the setup reported. (i.e.: Employee
works 5
> hours on a 10 hour setup and punches out for the day. Setup
Efficiency: 10/5
> = 200% yet the setup is only partially done). At the end of the
week or
> month when we review the setup efficiency it is inaccurate because
of these
> setups that straddle 2 or more days. Also, someone could spend
three 8 hour
> days (24 hours) on this 10 hour setup, yet each day would say they
were
> (10/8) 125% efficient in the setup.
> The costing in the job would be accurate with the 24 hours
accounted for but
> how do we account for setup in our incentive plan. Any ideas would
be
> appreciated. Thank you.
>
> Peter McGuire
> Lovejoy Chaplet Corp.
> pmcguire@l...
> (518) 686-5232
> Fax: 686-4919