All of these parts would be non-stock, qty bearing, standard costing.
I plan on doing some testing myself, but appreciate those of you who have done the deep dive providing directional assistance!
Ken
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rob Bucek
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:31 AM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Run Capture WIP - effect on Gross Margin Report
Correct, the only part im a bit shady on is that whether or not the item needs to be declared in the item master as stock or non stock. Id verify that as well. i.e. if you ship a 'stock' part from the job or if you ship a 'non stock' part from the job, I cant remember if that effects the costing scenario or not. I could do some checking later this morning.
Rob Bucek
Production Control Manager
PH: (715) 284-5376 ext 311
Mobile: (715)896-0590
FAX: (715)284-4084
[Description: cid:
1.234354861@...<mailto:1.234354861%40web65412.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>]<
http://www.dsmfg.com/>
(Click the logo to view our site)<
http://www.dsmfg.com/>
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Ken Williams
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 9:20 AM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Run Capture WIP - effect on Gross Margin Report
So having a standard costing method with $0 for the costs should not affect these as they are shipping from a job?
I'll have to dig into the GL side. First blush the costs are hitting because our financials for March are not way out of whack. It appears it's only the invoice costing detail that's missing.
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Rob Bucek
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:01 AM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Run Capture WIP - effect on Gross Margin Report
Those scenrios should only apply if shipping from stock... if you are shipping from the job, actual costs per job (as accumulated at time of shipment) should apply.
Rob Bucek
Production Control Manager
PH: (715) 284-5376 ext 311
Mobile: (715)896-0590
FAX: (715)284-4084
[Description: cid:
1.234354861@...<mailto:1.234354861%40web65412.mail.ac4.yahoo.com><mailto:1.234354861%40web65412.mail.ac4.yahoo.com><mailto:1.234354861%40web65412.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>]<
http://www.dsmfg.com/>
(Click the logo to view our site)<
http://www.dsmfg.com/>
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Ken Williams
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:58 AM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Run Capture WIP - effect on Gross Margin Report
Gary, I checked your list and we are good on all of those items...but I did notice something that I'm sure is causing our issue. I forgot we switched these particular parts to "standard" for costing type because last cost means nothing to us and was leading to incorrect information on reports in other areas. I can switch these back, but then I run into the issues we had with reporting.
Is there any way to get actual costs tied to an invoice without relying on last costing? What happens if we have 3 different units that ship in a given day, all with different costs? If the system is going off last costing then they're 2 out of the 3 units are going to have the wrong cost. What about the last 6 weeks of invoices, any way of adjusting the costs on these?
Thanks for the help,
Ken
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Manasa Reddy
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 6:13 AM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Run Capture WIP - effect on Gross Margin Report
If you ship off the job, then the job CANNOT be closed before you invoice.
M. Manasa Reddy
manasa@...<mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:
manasa@...<mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com>>
630.806.2000 x1515
Ex scientia, vera
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Gary Parfrey
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 12:37 PM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Run Capture WIP - effect on Gross Margin Report
Ken
Make sure your non stock manufactured items are quantity bearing on your part master.
Make sure you check the COS/Mfg variance checkbox when running capture COS WIP
Make sure you jobs are not closed before you have shipped the goods as you said, but jobs can be but do not have to be closed before invoicing
Gary
Gary Parfrey | Managing Director
Mobile: +44 7765 234 934
DDI: +44 121 314 1172
Main: +44 121 314 1170
Dot Net IT Limited, One St Kenelm Court, Steel Park Road, Halesowen, B62 8HD, United Kingdom.
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action based on this communication. If you have received this communication in error please contact
GaryP@...<mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:
GaryP@...<mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk><mailto:GaryP%40dotnetit.co.uk>> and delete this communication and any copies of it. Any views or opinions presented are soley of those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Dot Net IT Limited.
Dot Net IT Limited, Reg No 4412519
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Ken Williams
Sent: 06 April 2012 00:37
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Run Capture WIP - effect on Gross Margin Report
Rob & Virginia - what if you find that no costs are getting captured at the invoice level (and thus the sales GM report shows zero costs)? There's definitely costs to our jobs....but 99% of them are not showing on invoicing, even after capturing WIP.
For years I've been pulling transactional data to make my own reports, but I'd love to just get the system working. Any thoughts on what could cause this activity?
We typically close our jobs out after shipment, is there a requirement that jobs be closed BEFORE invoicing? Please tell me no....
Ken
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Virginia Joseph
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 7:38 AM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Run Capture WIP - effect on Gross Margin Report
Sorry Rob, that was a typo. I meant invoice tables, not inventory tables. I completely agree with your statements about inventory costing.
I have to say I did some more testing and you were right. The Inventory/WIP Reconciliation report seems to be more than just a report. I ran the sales gross margin report for Friday shipments and all the costs were blank (everything that shipped on Friday was make direct - no part number set-up in Vantage). Then I ran the Inventory/WIP Reconciliation report and then re-ran the sales gross margin report and now the job costs appear in the report. Thanks Rob! I now have a gross margin report we can use daily as long as we run Inventory/WIP recociliation on a daily basis!
Ken: Your interest in the effects of capturing without posting to GL is something that I cannot speak to because I have never run the COS capture process without posting to the GL. The only reason I run the COS capture process is specifically to post the transactions to my GL. If there is anyone that rus the COS capture on a regular basis without posting to the GL, I would like to hear what this accomplishes and how either report or data accuracy benefits.
Virginia Joseph
Deep Hole Specialists, LLC
CFO
440-708-5239
440-991-6714 cell
vjoseph@...<mailto:vjoseph%40deephole.com><mailto:vjoseph%40deephole.com><mailto:vjoseph%40deephole.com><mailto:vjoseph%40deephole.com><mailto:vjoseph%40deephole.com><mailto:vjoseph%40deephole.com><mailto:vjoseph%40deephole.com><mailto:vjoseph%40deephole.com>
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Rob Bucek <rbucek@...<mailto:rbucek@...<mailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...<mailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...<mailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...<mailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...%3cmailto:rbucek@...>>>>>> wrote:
>
> Im curious about what you mean regarding items shipped from inventory.. you mentioned that the inventory tables don't have job cost information. This isn't my area of expertise, but I like this area so im interested. What tables specifically are you speaking of? For our shop, being average costing for inventory value, average cost of inventory is recalculated every time you receive inventory from a job (I believe, correct me if im wrong on that one, id hate to have that presumption wrong). Are you standard cost for inventory? Fundamentally theres a complete disconnect when shipping from inventory with respects to job costing. If you ship from inventory the cost is your average or standard cost based on the accumulated costs from the job at the time of receipt. Here we control that by placing strict rules on how a job gets receipted to inventory. As I was writing this I had an epiphany...
>
> I went to my test environment, picked a job that had all its operations completed, materials issued and had not been shipped. This was a make direct job to a sales order. I shipped said job complete, opened the part in transaction history tracker and noted that for that transaction the columns Amount, Mtl Unit Cost, Lbr Unit Cost, Bur Unit Cost were all zero... doing nothing else, I ran WIP rec against that job, I then simply refreshed the transaction history tracker, and those columns were then populated with costs... so..that was were my perception of something is going on when you run that report..or some damn programmer is able to find a random temp table and is at the very least populating part tran records from this..remember..its our test environment.. hard to think it could be something else.. what are your thoughts...I can send you screen shots offline if you are interested.
>
> Rob Bucek
> Production Control Manager
> PH: (715) 284-5376 ext 311
> Mobile: (715)896-0590
> FAX: (715)284-4084
> [Description: cid:1.234354861@...]<http://www.dsmfg.com/>
> (Click the logo to view our site)<http://www.dsmfg.com/>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________
Total Control Panel
Login<https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=weldcoa.com>
To: manasa@...<mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=516126014&domain=weldcoa.com>
From: sentto-20369-109155-1333820195-manasa=weldcoa.com@...<mailto:sentto-20369-109155-1333820195-manasa%3Dweldcoa.com%40returns.groups.yahoo.com><mailto:sentto-20369-109155-1333820195-manasa%3Dweldcoa.com%40returns.groups.yahoo.com><mailto:sentto-20369-109155-1333820195-manasa%3Dweldcoa.com%40returns.groups.yahoo.com><mailto:sentto-20369-109155-1333820195-manasa%3Dweldcoa.com%40returns.groups.yahoo.com><mailto:sentto-20369-109155-1333820195-manasa%3Dweldcoa.com%40returns.groups.yahoo.com><https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=619865755&domain=weldcoa.com>
Message Score: 60
High (60): Fail
My Spam Blocking Level: Low
Medium (75): Pass
Low (90): Pass
Block<https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2&bl-sender-address=1&rID=516126014&aID=619865755&domain=weldcoa.com> this sender
Block<https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2&bl-sender-domain=1&rID=516126014&aID=619865755&domain=weldcoa.com> returns.groups.yahoo.com
This message was delivered because the content filter score did not exceed your filter level.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]