Thanks Cathy. That is what we are doing as well.
I was hoping we had simply missed some more 'elegant' method of doing it but, after spending several hours on Sunday playing around with the applications in a non-live db, found nothing better.
It IS possible to do the rework within the original source job where the op non-conformance occurred. However, we utilize the job qty recalc process (based on reported op yield) and that effectively precludes doing the rework within the source job.
It would also be an 'other way' of doing reworks (differing from the way to do rework of PO or discovered inventory non-conformances)... My experience is that it is always better to have 'one way' to do something (especially for processes like rework which hopefully aren't routine events) - otherwise people get confused and the process execution goes awry.
Thanks again.
Rob Brown
I was hoping we had simply missed some more 'elegant' method of doing it but, after spending several hours on Sunday playing around with the applications in a non-live db, found nothing better.
It IS possible to do the rework within the original source job where the op non-conformance occurred. However, we utilize the job qty recalc process (based on reported op yield) and that effectively precludes doing the rework within the source job.
It would also be an 'other way' of doing reworks (differing from the way to do rework of PO or discovered inventory non-conformances)... My experience is that it is always better to have 'one way' to do something (especially for processes like rework which hopefully aren't routine events) - otherwise people get confused and the process execution goes awry.
Thanks again.
Rob Brown
--- On Mon, 9/15/08, Kathy Schaich <kathy.schaich@...> wrote:
From: Kathy Schaich <kathy.schaich@...>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] rework on a job
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, September 15, 2008, 8:26 AM
Our process is to remove the non-conforming quantity from the operation that
created it through the non-conforming process of the quality module. We
create a rework job which has all of the operations starting with the rework
operation and then any subsequent operations needed to complete that part.
We add the part as a material and then in DMR processing accept the quantity
to the rework job. We then go back to the old job and adjust the quantity to
reflect the actual number of parts which we expect to finish on that job.
Not a real elegant way to do it but this is how we track our non-conforming
ppm's.
Kathy Schaich
Operations Support Manager
Ultra Tool & Manufacturing, Inc.
W169 N5954 Ridgewood Drive
Menomonee Falls, WI 53051
Phone: 262-703-0455
Fax: 262-703-0468
Toll Free: 800-779-3566
kathy.schaich@ ultratoolmfg. com
www.ultratoolmfg. com
The information contained in this electronic message (email) and any
attachment(s) to it is/are intended for the exclusive use of the intended
addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential and/or
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient(s) and have received this communication in error,
please do not distribute it. Instead, please notify Ultra Tool &
Manufacturing, Inc. at 1-800-779-3566 or by email at
general@ultratoolmf g.com and destroy all copies of this message and any
attachments. Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups .com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com] On Behalf Of
jimlmm24521
Sent: September 12, 2008 2:07 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Subject: [Vantage] rework on a job
Am also wondering what others are doing for jobs that require rework
for an operation that isn't normally a part of the router.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]