Revision Function

You can use Customer Part Maintenance to create a relationship between the Customer part number and your part number. That way when your customer gives you their part number, enter it in the sales order in the customer part field and vantage will automatically populate your part number with the one that corresponds to the customer part number you selected.

Virginia Joseph
Deep Hole Specialists, LLC
440-708-5239


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@...> wrote:
>
> So our customers can re-order these custom parts if they wan't without changes to them. How does that work? Among hundreds of thousands of parts how do we find the one they have ordered before and are requesting now, unless they give us the part number we created for them, which in most cases they don't they use their own part number. Should we be creating working with them and creating alias numbers for the custom parts at the time we create them so they do not get lost?
>
What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
>but this does not appear to be the case.
Can you give an example?

>We were hoping inventory and shipping
>would be controlled based on revision
If the part is Non-Stock, the system should be ship the rev. from the Sale Order.
But if your parts are stock, maybe not... would you bin different revisions together?

We use revisions for "make" parts - to define the BOM & method of manufacture.
We do have Revs for some purchase parts - to list replacement parts in a BOMs. ( The BOM is ignored by the system for P parts).

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@...> wrote:
>
> What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
>
We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of cooner_55421
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:40 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function



>but this does not appear to be the case.
Can you give an example?

>We were hoping inventory and shipping
>would be controlled based on revision
If the part is Non-Stock, the system should be ship the rev. from the Sale Order.
But if your parts are stock, maybe not... would you bin different revisions together?

We use revisions for "make" parts - to define the BOM & method of manufacture.
We do have Revs for some purchase parts - to list replacement parts in a BOMs. ( The BOM is ignored by the system for P parts).

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@...<mailto:jgiese@...>> wrote:
>
> What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
>


CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606

That being the case should we plan on creating revisions for all of our purchased parts right now. We are in implementation stage running on 604 right now.

> Can you give an example?

We make paper bags. In this instance we have a sky blue bag. it is a stock part, non-stock is not checked. We are going to be getting paper from a different supplier and the color is slightly different. Everything else about that bag is the same. We wanted to use Rev A as the old paper and Rev B is the new paper same part. We put an order through for Rev B and at the picking process there was nothing to indicate to shipping which rev to ship to the customer. No maybe we missed something and it was going to the bin that has that rev and we overlooked that portion of it?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@...> wrote:
>
> We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of cooner_55421
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:40 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
>
>
>
> >but this does not appear to be the case.
> Can you give an example?
>
> >We were hoping inventory and shipping
> >would be controlled based on revision
> If the part is Non-Stock, the system should be ship the rev. from the Sale Order.
> But if your parts are stock, maybe not... would you bin different revisions together?
>
> We use revisions for "make" parts - to define the BOM & method of manufacture.
> We do have Revs for some purchase parts - to list replacement parts in a BOMs. ( The BOM is ignored by the system for P parts).
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@<mailto:jgiese@>> wrote:
> >
> > What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
> >
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
On Part Maintenance > Detail tab there is "Use Part Rev" check box
which if checked will prompt MRP to use the latest revision. When not
checked then you can manually create demand for different revisions. The
field help describes it in more details.



Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.

mtonoyan@...



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of jgiese1988
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Revision Function





What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other
areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping
would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision
but this does not appear to be the case. Help?




______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
______________________________________________________________________

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Shipping should be able to see the revision called on the sales order, however....
Inventory is not revision controlled, yet. You can either customize to show the revision in lot control or create a new part #.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:56 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function



> We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606

That being the case should we plan on creating revisions for all of our purchased parts right now. We are in implementation stage running on 604 right now.

> Can you give an example?

We make paper bags. In this instance we have a sky blue bag. it is a stock part, non-stock is not checked. We are going to be getting paper from a different supplier and the color is slightly different. Everything else about that bag is the same. We wanted to use Rev A as the old paper and Rev B is the new paper same part. We put an order through for Rev B and at the picking process there was nothing to indicate to shipping which rev to ship to the customer. No maybe we missed something and it was going to the bin that has that rev and we overlooked that portion of it?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@...<mailto:skaufman@...>> wrote:
>
> We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of cooner_55421
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:40 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
>
>
>
> >but this does not appear to be the case.
> Can you give an example?
>
> >We were hoping inventory and shipping
> >would be controlled based on revision
> If the part is Non-Stock, the system should be ship the rev. from the Sale Order.
> But if your parts are stock, maybe not... would you bin different revisions together?
>
> We use revisions for "make" parts - to define the BOM & method of manufacture.
> We do have Revs for some purchase parts - to list replacement parts in a BOMs. ( The BOM is ignored by the system for P parts).
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@<mailto:jgiese@>> wrote:
> >
> > What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
> >
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Ahh... so essentially your suggesting create lots for those parts and use the Rev as the lot number so there is a consistent identifier all the way through the system. Correct?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@...> wrote:
>
> Shipping should be able to see the revision called on the sales order, however....
> Inventory is not revision controlled, yet. You can either customize to show the revision in lot control or create a new part #.
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:56 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
>
>
>
> > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
>
> That being the case should we plan on creating revisions for all of our purchased parts right now. We are in implementation stage running on 604 right now.
>
> > Can you give an example?
>
> We make paper bags. In this instance we have a sky blue bag. it is a stock part, non-stock is not checked. We are going to be getting paper from a different supplier and the color is slightly different. Everything else about that bag is the same. We wanted to use Rev A as the old paper and Rev B is the new paper same part. We put an order through for Rev B and at the picking process there was nothing to indicate to shipping which rev to ship to the customer. No maybe we missed something and it was going to the bin that has that rev and we overlooked that portion of it?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@<mailto:skaufman@>> wrote:
> >
> > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of cooner_55421
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:40 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
> >
> >
> >
> > >but this does not appear to be the case.
> > Can you give an example?
> >
> > >We were hoping inventory and shipping
> > >would be controlled based on revision
> > If the part is Non-Stock, the system should be ship the rev. from the Sale Order.
> > But if your parts are stock, maybe not... would you bin different revisions together?
> >
> > We use revisions for "make" parts - to define the BOM & method of manufacture.
> > We do have Revs for some purchase parts - to list replacement parts in a BOMs. ( The BOM is ignored by the system for P parts).
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@<mailto:jgiese@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
> > >
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
For parts that have more than one active revisions, that is the only solution we have found.
This does not stop shipping from sending the wrong revision however.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:11 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function



Ahh... so essentially your suggesting create lots for those parts and use the Rev as the lot number so there is a consistent identifier all the way through the system. Correct?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@...<mailto:skaufman@...>> wrote:
>
> Shipping should be able to see the revision called on the sales order, however....
> Inventory is not revision controlled, yet. You can either customize to show the revision in lot control or create a new part #.
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:56 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
>
>
>
> > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
>
> That being the case should we plan on creating revisions for all of our purchased parts right now. We are in implementation stage running on 604 right now.
>
> > Can you give an example?
>
> We make paper bags. In this instance we have a sky blue bag. it is a stock part, non-stock is not checked. We are going to be getting paper from a different supplier and the color is slightly different. Everything else about that bag is the same. We wanted to use Rev A as the old paper and Rev B is the new paper same part. We put an order through for Rev B and at the picking process there was nothing to indicate to shipping which rev to ship to the customer. No maybe we missed something and it was going to the bin that has that rev and we overlooked that portion of it?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@<mailto:skaufman@>> wrote:
> >
> > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of cooner_55421
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:40 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
> >
> >
> >
> > >but this does not appear to be the case.
> > Can you give an example?
> >
> > >We were hoping inventory and shipping
> > >would be controlled based on revision
> > If the part is Non-Stock, the system should be ship the rev. from the Sale Order.
> > But if your parts are stock, maybe not... would you bin different revisions together?
> >
> > We use revisions for "make" parts - to define the BOM & method of manufacture.
> > We do have Revs for some purchase parts - to list replacement parts in a BOMs. ( The BOM is ignored by the system for P parts).
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@<mailto:jgiese@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
> > >
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
If it's lot controlled though it will at least get them to the right bin correct? We will have to pilot this and see how it goes.

> For parts that have more than one active revisions, that is the only solution we have found.

That blows you would think that revisions could control inventory and have multiple active revisions to run down stock in an old revision. Were trying to avoid having to make a million custom parts when the method of manufacture doesn't change but just the material used changes.

Two examples, the color of ink used on a printed paper bag changes from blue to green. All of the part is the same but it would be nice that rev A is blue and rev B is green, or however we wanted to name them.

Is there another place we should be doing something like that for our custom parts?


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@...> wrote:
>
> For parts that have more than one active revisions, that is the only solution we have found.
> This does not stop shipping from sending the wrong revision however.
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:11 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
>
>
>
> Ahh... so essentially your suggesting create lots for those parts and use the Rev as the lot number so there is a consistent identifier all the way through the system. Correct?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@<mailto:skaufman@>> wrote:
> >
> > Shipping should be able to see the revision called on the sales order, however....
> > Inventory is not revision controlled, yet. You can either customize to show the revision in lot control or create a new part #.
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:56 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
> >
> >
> >
> > > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
> >
> > That being the case should we plan on creating revisions for all of our purchased parts right now. We are in implementation stage running on 604 right now.
> >
> > > Can you give an example?
> >
> > We make paper bags. In this instance we have a sky blue bag. it is a stock part, non-stock is not checked. We are going to be getting paper from a different supplier and the color is slightly different. Everything else about that bag is the same. We wanted to use Rev A as the old paper and Rev B is the new paper same part. We put an order through for Rev B and at the picking process there was nothing to indicate to shipping which rev to ship to the customer. No maybe we missed something and it was going to the bin that has that rev and we overlooked that portion of it?
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@<mailto:skaufman@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
> > >
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of cooner_55421
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:40 AM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >but this does not appear to be the case.
> > > Can you give an example?
> > >
> > > >We were hoping inventory and shipping
> > > >would be controlled based on revision
> > > If the part is Non-Stock, the system should be ship the rev. from the Sale Order.
> > > But if your parts are stock, maybe not... would you bin different revisions together?
> > >
> > > We use revisions for "make" parts - to define the BOM & method of manufacture.
> > > We do have Revs for some purchase parts - to list replacement parts in a BOMs. ( The BOM is ignored by the system for P parts).
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@<mailto:jgiese@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
From what I hear, they are working on inventory revisions but it could be a while.

Not knowing your shop, it's hard to say how I'd use lot control. We use lot number for EVERYTHING.
If your part MOMs do not change after they are created, I would just use different part numbers for every custom part. You can have a million parts or a million Revs. It's just as easy to duplicate a part for a different color.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:27 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function



If it's lot controlled though it will at least get them to the right bin correct? We will have to pilot this and see how it goes.

> For parts that have more than one active revisions, that is the only solution we have found.

That blows you would think that revisions could control inventory and have multiple active revisions to run down stock in an old revision. Were trying to avoid having to make a million custom parts when the method of manufacture doesn't change but just the material used changes.

Two examples, the color of ink used on a printed paper bag changes from blue to green. All of the part is the same but it would be nice that rev A is blue and rev B is green, or however we wanted to name them.

Is there another place we should be doing something like that for our custom parts?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@...<mailto:skaufman@...>> wrote:
>
> For parts that have more than one active revisions, that is the only solution we have found.
> This does not stop shipping from sending the wrong revision however.
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:11 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
>
>
>
> Ahh... so essentially your suggesting create lots for those parts and use the Rev as the lot number so there is a consistent identifier all the way through the system. Correct?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@<mailto:skaufman@>> wrote:
> >
> > Shipping should be able to see the revision called on the sales order, however....
> > Inventory is not revision controlled, yet. You can either customize to show the revision in lot control or create a new part #.
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:56 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
> >
> >
> >
> > > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
> >
> > That being the case should we plan on creating revisions for all of our purchased parts right now. We are in implementation stage running on 604 right now.
> >
> > > Can you give an example?
> >
> > We make paper bags. In this instance we have a sky blue bag. it is a stock part, non-stock is not checked. We are going to be getting paper from a different supplier and the color is slightly different. Everything else about that bag is the same. We wanted to use Rev A as the old paper and Rev B is the new paper same part. We put an order through for Rev B and at the picking process there was nothing to indicate to shipping which rev to ship to the customer. No maybe we missed something and it was going to the bin that has that rev and we overlooked that portion of it?
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@<mailto:skaufman@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
> > >
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of cooner_55421
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:40 AM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >but this does not appear to be the case.
> > > Can you give an example?
> > >
> > > >We were hoping inventory and shipping
> > > >would be controlled based on revision
> > > If the part is Non-Stock, the system should be ship the rev. from the Sale Order.
> > > But if your parts are stock, maybe not... would you bin different revisions together?
> > >
> > > We use revisions for "make" parts - to define the BOM & method of manufacture.
> > > We do have Revs for some purchase parts - to list replacement parts in a BOMs. ( The BOM is ignored by the system for P parts).
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@<mailto:jgiese@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
So our customers can re-order these custom parts if they wan't without changes to them. How does that work? Among hundreds of thousands of parts how do we find the one they have ordered before and are requesting now, unless they give us the part number we created for them, which in most cases they don't they use their own part number. Should we be creating working with them and creating alias numbers for the custom parts at the time we create them so they do not get lost?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@...> wrote:
>
> From what I hear, they are working on inventory revisions but it could be a while.
>
> Not knowing your shop, it's hard to say how I'd use lot control. We use lot number for EVERYTHING.
> If your part MOMs do not change after they are created, I would just use different part numbers for every custom part. You can have a million parts or a million Revs. It's just as easy to duplicate a part for a different color.
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:27 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
>
>
>
> If it's lot controlled though it will at least get them to the right bin correct? We will have to pilot this and see how it goes.
>
> > For parts that have more than one active revisions, that is the only solution we have found.
>
> That blows you would think that revisions could control inventory and have multiple active revisions to run down stock in an old revision. Were trying to avoid having to make a million custom parts when the method of manufacture doesn't change but just the material used changes.
>
> Two examples, the color of ink used on a printed paper bag changes from blue to green. All of the part is the same but it would be nice that rev A is blue and rev B is green, or however we wanted to name them.
>
> Is there another place we should be doing something like that for our custom parts?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@<mailto:skaufman@>> wrote:
> >
> > For parts that have more than one active revisions, that is the only solution we have found.
> > This does not stop shipping from sending the wrong revision however.
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:11 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
> >
> >
> >
> > Ahh... so essentially your suggesting create lots for those parts and use the Rev as the lot number so there is a consistent identifier all the way through the system. Correct?
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@<mailto:skaufman@>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Shipping should be able to see the revision called on the sales order, however....
> > > Inventory is not revision controlled, yet. You can either customize to show the revision in lot control or create a new part #.
> > >
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of jgiese1988
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:56 AM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
> > >
> > > That being the case should we plan on creating revisions for all of our purchased parts right now. We are in implementation stage running on 604 right now.
> > >
> > > > Can you give an example?
> > >
> > > We make paper bags. In this instance we have a sky blue bag. it is a stock part, non-stock is not checked. We are going to be getting paper from a different supplier and the color is slightly different. Everything else about that bag is the same. We wanted to use Rev A as the old paper and Rev B is the new paper same part. We put an order through for Rev B and at the picking process there was nothing to indicate to shipping which rev to ship to the customer. No maybe we missed something and it was going to the bin that has that rev and we overlooked that portion of it?
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Scott Kaufman <skaufman@<mailto:skaufman@>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We recently discovered that purchase suggestions are not created for purchased parts unless they have an approved revision. 9.05.606
> > > >
> > > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of cooner_55421
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:40 AM
> > > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Revision Function
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >but this does not appear to be the case.
> > > > Can you give an example?
> > > >
> > > > >We were hoping inventory and shipping
> > > > >would be controlled based on revision
> > > > If the part is Non-Stock, the system should be ship the rev. from the Sale Order.
> > > > But if your parts are stock, maybe not... would you bin different revisions together?
> > > >
> > > > We use revisions for "make" parts - to define the BOM & method of manufacture.
> > > > We do have Revs for some purchase parts - to list replacement parts in a BOMs. ( The BOM is ignored by the system for P parts).
> > > >
> > > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, "jgiese1988" <jgiese@<mailto:jgiese@>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What functionality does revision play within Epicor 9. What all other areas are affected by revisions. We were hoping inventory and shipping would be controlled based on revision since you can order by revision but this does not appear to be the case. Help?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this email message, including any attachment(s), may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. The email is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or use of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or disseminating, and notify the sender by Reply email, so that our address record can be corrected.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>