Hi Chris,
Everything below makes sense, when we need to we allready create
a 'part on the fly' when one does not yet exist.
I like the idea of projects but I'm now not sure they'll give me what
I need, in that costs are not genuinely rolled up. What I mean is
that I may have various jobs assigned to a WBS phase, however, any
costs associated with a WBS phase job do not roll up to the parent
job of the project for billing purposes.
e.g. the project has a 'Project Job Detail/Parent Job' making a
specific part that has a BOM/MOM created, I also have a WBS phase
with an associated job that has say the equivelant of $5,000 worth of
labor entered against it. Now I think I'm right in that this $5,000
worth of labor is never flushed to or associated with the 'Project
Job Detail/Parent Job' in any way ?, once all of the jobs have been
completed in the project the part I'm manufacturing in the 'Project
Job Detail/Parent Job' will have $0/zero labor costs against it if I
look at the part costs in the Part Tracker ?.
Thanks.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "chrisb53029" <chris.berger@...>
wrote:
Everything below makes sense, when we need to we allready create
a 'part on the fly' when one does not yet exist.
I like the idea of projects but I'm now not sure they'll give me what
I need, in that costs are not genuinely rolled up. What I mean is
that I may have various jobs assigned to a WBS phase, however, any
costs associated with a WBS phase job do not roll up to the parent
job of the project for billing purposes.
e.g. the project has a 'Project Job Detail/Parent Job' making a
specific part that has a BOM/MOM created, I also have a WBS phase
with an associated job that has say the equivelant of $5,000 worth of
labor entered against it. Now I think I'm right in that this $5,000
worth of labor is never flushed to or associated with the 'Project
Job Detail/Parent Job' in any way ?, once all of the jobs have been
completed in the project the part I'm manufacturing in the 'Project
Job Detail/Parent Job' will have $0/zero labor costs against it if I
look at the part costs in the Part Tracker ?.
Thanks.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "chrisb53029" <chris.berger@...>
wrote:
>accomplish
> Now, this could get fun having an accountant pipe in on the
> conversation of jobs.
>
> However, I think there might be a couple creative ways to
> this. The first one that comes to mind is if you use the projectthe
> management module, you can tie various jobs under the project for
> customer, and the jobs can be separate. You would open a job for athrough
> part called CAD Design attach it to the project with one or as many
> operations on that CAD job (multiple operations if you desire to
> capture the type of work performed by the CAD department...i.e. CAD
> prep, CAD Design, CAD Review, etc...). Another way could be
> the field service module AND through projects. Open a service callimplies
> and job for CAD design, it would be tied to the customer project.
> (I'm leaning toward the Project module since you indicated it would
> be months or even years to complete the cutomer order...that
> to me there might be a whole host of other costs / jobs / servicesnumber...in
> that are incurred for that customer order that you may want to
> capture under one umbrella...called Project)
>
> Aside from the Project module....even though you don't have a Part
> master set up, Vantage does allow you to free-form a part
> other words input a part number (on a job or on a sales order) thatthen
> is not in the Part Master. Simply assign the number (but this may
> mean some off line tracking to make sure numbers are not double
> used.) Then after design and specifications are available, you
> set up the Part number in the master table and add your MOM. Theorder
> system allows you to use this free form part number on a sales
> which you then will see on the planning work bench, which you canthe
> then open a job (of course there are no details to get) but you can
> add a CAD operation manually on the job. Later when the part is
> designed and a MOM is configured, you can append the Details into
> existing job.that
>
> Anticipating you might say that you don't have a sales order at
> time...you can still open a new job (not from a sales order and notthe
> through the planners workbench), input the free form number, add
> CAD operation. It's just later, you would have to make sure whenthe
> sales order is entered you maintain all of the links through Jobthis
> Manager and Job Entry (i.e. tie the existing job back to the sales
> order, change the Demand link from Stock to Order, etc...)
>
> One of these ways should work, but it might be a little maintenance
> effort.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "clive.1972" <clive.1972@> wrote:
> >
> > I think I already know the answer to this but is there any way
> possible
> > of entering/recording labor in Vantage without a job having an
> > operation ?.
> >
> > We need to record our CAD/Design work against a job, obviously
> > cannot be done until the job has a part against it and there's atthis.
> least
> > one operation on the job. What we intend to do is have our
> CAD/Design
> > guys record their time in an Excel spreadsheet, and then once the
> job
> > has an operation enter all time from the spreadsheet against
> We
> > can't see any way of doing this without having to manualy record
> the
> > time outside of Vantage for a short while.
> >
> > I'm aware of various time recording software out there that I can
> > install on their workstations but that's still outside of Vantage.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>