Purchasing Approval System

-----Original Message-----
From: Winter, Patrick [mailto:pjw@...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:24 PM
To: Vantage User Group on Onelist (E-mail)
Subject: [Vantage] Purchasing Approval System


Has anyone set this up for their company?

What do you think?

In PO entry when you select APPROVALS and get the "PO Approval Activity"
wouldn't it be better if this sorted by date descending instead of
ascending. With the way it is you always have to scroll to the end to see
what was just approved.

PO's pending approval will not print but you can MASS PRINT, is this a
programming error?

Shouldn't the buyer maintenance entry screens validate against the user
table? Now if you don't match the buyer ID to user ID and buyer name to
user name exactly it doesn't work. Is their a reason for this or is it just
crappy programming?

Patrick Winter


Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Has anyone set this up for their company?

What do you think?

In PO entry when you select APPROVALS and get the "PO Approval Activity"
wouldn't it be better if this sorted by date descending instead of
ascending. With the way it is you always have to scroll to the end to see
what was just approved.

PO's pending approval will not print but you can MASS PRINT, is this a
programming error?

Shouldn't the buyer maintenance entry screens validate against the user
table? Now if you don't match the buyer ID to user ID and buyer name to
user name exactly it doesn't work. Is their a reason for this or is it just
crappy programming?

Patrick Winter