While you're waiting for Epicor to address a partial hold on job
enhancement, you might consider directing some of your standard
Vantage reports to a Generic - Text Only Printer Disk File. For
example, a Progress program could read the Time Phased Material
Requirements output, get each job's scheduling priority, eliminate
ones that are "Very Low" and regenerate the report. This doesn't
entail changing Vantage source code yet allows you to utilize their
standard reports in a custom way.
Chris Robisch
425-788-2489
enhancement, you might consider directing some of your standard
Vantage reports to a Generic - Text Only Printer Disk File. For
example, a Progress program could read the Time Phased Material
Requirements output, get each job's scheduling priority, eliminate
ones that are "Very Low" and regenerate the report. This doesn't
entail changing Vantage source code yet allows you to utilize their
standard reports in a custom way.
Chris Robisch
425-788-2489
--- In vantage@egroups.com, Paul Siebers <paul.siebers@b...> wrote:
> Dina & Vantage group,
>
> I think we are encountering the same problem that you guys did.
Your
> solution (adding a priority code)was something I was hoping Vantage
> would offer, but I didn't see an easy way of implementing it. What
> exactly did you do, and how does it affect your operations?
> I have figured out I can create a new priority factor in the
Scheduling
> Priority Codes Maintenance field. The help menu doesn't tell me if
I
> can use 0 as a factor, which I would be inclined to use. If I can,
does
> it hold true that the job does no longer generate a demand on
materials.
> And can people still clock hours to a job on hold? I guess I will
be
> playing with my Vantage Test Box as well to get more insight in
priority
> codes...
>
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dina Hieber [mailto:dhieber@v...]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:33 AM
> To: vantage@egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Placing Jobs on Hold
>
>
> Paul,
>
> What we do is also unrelease the job and unengineer the job. But we
> were having problems with people thinking someone made a mistake and
> forgot to check the box. So what we did under Schedule Priority -
we
> created that states ON HOLD. We also created a bitmap -
> which is very noticable that SAYS HOLD. - This seems to have
helped us
> - but we do not put that many jobs on hold.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Dina
> Paul Siebers wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Maybe I am missing something; but is there a way in which a job
can be
> > placed on hold in Vantage where it doesn't generate a material and
> parts
> > demand?
> >
> > I recently took Vantage mgmt over from the person who installed it
> > originally, and in the past we have placed jobs on hold by simply
> > unchecking the Engineered and Released boxes in the Job Entry
screen.
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > Paul Siebers
> >
> >
> > We no longer allow attachments to files. To access/share Report
> Files, please go to the following link:
> http://www.egroups.com/files/vantage/
> > (Note: If this link does not work for you the first time you try
it,
> go to www.egroups.com, login and be sure to save your password,
choose
> My Groups, choose Vantage, then choose Files. If you save the
password,
> the link above will work the next time you try it.)
>
>
>
> We no longer allow attachments to files. To access/share Report
Files,
> please go to the following link:
http://www.egroups.com/files/vantage/
> (Note: If this link does not work for you the first time you try
it, go
> to www.egroups.com, login and be sure to save your password, choose
My
> Groups, choose Vantage, then choose Files. If you save the
password,
> the link above will work the next time you try it.)