Not to put to fine a point on this problem, but you have a description field
that contains meaningful information about the part. You can search on this
field. You can show the part numbers is description order. It is really
important to look at what is being done within the system. There are
fields, such as the description, that are designed to give the type of
information that you are trying to cram into the part number. There is a
distinction between manufactured and purchased parts in the system itself.
Use the fields for what they were designed for and quit making a project out
of nothing. (Not you, but management.) Suggest that possibly this manager
does not have enough to occupy his time and should take up golf.
Cameron A. Janish
Misha1
866-464-7421
cameron@...
-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Anderson [mailto:
tanderson@...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 01:41 PM
To: '
vantage@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Part Number advise
Lonnie,
Ok, Ok, I probably deserved that :-) ... So I'm a little passionate about
my dislike for long part #'s ... The last company I worked for had a 22
character part number formatted as xxx-xx-xxxx-x-xx-xxxxx ... the field
was
alpha-numeric and all positions including dashes had to be entered. Heck,
I
got tired of just trying to get those item numbers to fit on reports ....
As to changing all occurrences of part numbers in Vantage. You are
correct,
a custom program will have to be written. Plus changing all blue prints,
folders etc.
My point was that if Paul does the math on the cost of the custom program,
plus the time per item to change the folders, blue prints, etc, plus the
training for this new "Meaningful" part number TIMES the number of items
on
file he MAY be able to persuade management that there are better ways to
spend money. The really hard number is trying to compute the cost of a
longer part numbering scheme for the next 10 years. If it takes 1 minute
to enter 50 short numerical numbers vs. 2 minutes for longer alpha-numeric
numbers, what does it cost over 10 years ? X number of parts per day by
Y
number of people x 200 days a year x 10 years x Z number of minutes x $
40.00/hr (?) = $$$ Truly, a Chinese water torture.
One company I worked for liked the idea that purchased parts should start
with P- as opposed to manufactured items that started with M- .... a
really
spiffy idea until you point out that sometimes manufactured parts end up
being purchased and vice-versa.
If you start out with a reasonably short "Meaningful" item number it's one
thing ... changing in midstream is really expensive.
Paul, try to figure the math if you can. I think it's the only hope you
have of derailing this project. There is a definite cost involved in
switching your item numbering scheme. Where is the cost savings in having
meaningful item numbers ?
Todd
-----Original Message-----
From: Lonnie Drew [mailto:
lonniedrew@...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:50 PM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Part Number advise
BRAVO,TODD! (standing ovation in progress) You may have just saved
Paul from a nightmare incarnate.
But what if management DOESN'T listen? I've thought before about
what it would take to replace/delete one partnum, let alone all.
If replacing a part name, wouldn't you have to replace all references
to that part in other tables (part, partrev, partaudit, partbin,
partwhse, partdtl, partdim, parttran, other part tables, orderdtl,
orderrel, jobhead, jobasmbl, joboper, jobmtl, shipdtl, invcdtl, and
I'm sure many others)?
The Vantage part replace/delete program only replaces/deletes
references to the part in bill of materials? What about any custom
reports/programs that link from part->jobhead, shipdtl, invcdtl,
parttran, partbin and others, or vice-versa? Is there a partnum
database write trigger that replaces all references to that part? I
doubt it.
And what if drawing filenames change? A Progress program could be
written that lists all part images, allows user to select one, then
user types/enters a new image name, and the program copies and
renames the image file. The Drawings table in Vantage would have to
be mass updated also.
If anyone has written a program to replace/delete a partnum, I would
also like to hear what it took. Is there a simpler approach I'm
overlooking?
Mark? william? I'm sure you guys have done it.
Lonnie
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<
http://rd.yahoo.com/M=210544.1579977.3132570.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050071
83:HM/A=776677/R=0/*
http://ads.track-star.com/adspace.ts?ts=1;2;217;107_222_
105_264> Lose 20 lbs by November 5th!
<
http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=210544.1579977.3132570.1261774/D=egroupmai
l/S=1705007183:HM/A=776677/rand=988531927>
Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
<
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.>
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
<
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages>
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
<
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]