One-sided journal entry 803.404B

But what we do (cause we do the same thing here), is just make the line
at $0, yep I know you want the traceability, but here is when you can
implement a change log and when the dollar amount is reduced to zero, it
should show it in the log...play with it and see for yourself...it could
work...




M. Manasa Reddy
manasa@...
P: 630-806-2000
F: 630-806-2001

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Carey S
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 5:13 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B


One reason I can think of is the sale of parts at full discount for good
will or similar type reasons. By removing the line, I lose traceability
of the part transaction...



Will continue to ponder though.

Thanks

Carey



To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
From: manasa@...
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:56:04 -0500
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B





I'm not going to be able to say what is better in terms of the
accounting, but on the procedure side why not do this:

Go ahead and delete the line that will not be invoiced (or would get the
100% discount) then in the comments, make a note of what happened, why
the line was deleted, etc.

Unless there is a good way to take care of this from the accounting
side, why not look into something like this at least procedurally?

Just one idea....



M. Manasa Reddy
manasa@...
P: 630-806-2000
F: 630-806-2001


________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Carey S
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:49 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

Thank you to everyone that has helped with this issue.

There is an underlying issue that seems to have identified itself as an
imbalance.

We have scenarios where we must use order discounts. We advise our sales
order people to not change the line price (item price) directly, but to
leave the list price as is and then adjust the discount accordingly.
However, for items that are no charge, the system prevents you from
entering a full 100-percent discount. One of the invoices that seems to
have caused this imbalance was for 2 hours of labor (but could easily be
for parts). So, for 2x$100/HR, the line total will be $200. If it is
actually not going to be charged, they simply enter the discount as a
flat amount to get the invoice to reflect a zero total.

The imbalance was that the $0 order total hit the A/R detail journal.
However, the total discount of $200 hit the sales discount journal. This
is what seems to have caused the balance.

So, maybe someone is able to see easily that there is a bug, or that
there is a misstep in setup/procedure here.?

Please remember that accounting jargon is not my strongsuit. I hope this
all makes sense.

Carey

To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
From: t.rose@... <mailto:t.rose%40electricmirror.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:20:29 -0700
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

Of course, you should never get into a situation where a one-sided entry
is necessary. Unless you are allowing one sided entries, Vantage/Vista
will theoretically prevent them from happening. Theoretically is the
operative word here, because that simply does not happen. Admittedly a
rare occurrence judging by what I read in this exchange and my limited
experience, they nonetheless occur. Once one out of balance entry has
gotten in, if you ever want your GL to balance again, you have no choice
but to make a one sided entry to correct the problem. You may even be
able to research and find out what caused the problem, but you still
have to fix the problem. As a Controller, I would recommend that one
sided entries SHOULD be entered, but only in the rare case when the
underlying system has created an out of balance condition. I also
recommend that one should thoroughly research the problem, and identify
the source before posting the one sided entry.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
F 425 491-8200
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electricmirror.com
<http://www.electricmirror.com> >

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Hattie Saulsberry
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

A one side journal entry is a sure sign there is an unknown problem As a
Controller I would recommend they NEVER be entered, but instead research
the true cause of the problem. I don;t check this site often, so if you
would like more information, please contact me directly

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Carey S <rotary1@...> wrote:
>
>
> One of our accountants is asking how to perform a "one-sided journal
entry.".
>
> I am not an accountant, so my questions are likely to make no more
sense than my answers.
>
> But, from what I understand, when she runs a trial balance, she is
seeing an imbalance, and so I assume she is just trying to force a
balance.
>
> Does anyone have any comment, suggestion, or solution I can work with?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Carey
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
>
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_0320
09
<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032
009>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__________________________________________________________
Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_0320
09
<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032
009>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]









_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live(tm) Groups: Create an online spot for your favorite groups
to meet.
http://windowslive.com/online/groups?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_groups_032009

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
Heads up!
For anyone planning on upgrading to 407a patch in the near future,
please be sure to test Labor Entry (add new entry) and then get the
one-off patch from Epicor before you upgrade.
Otherwise we have been fairly happy with 407a.
Best of luck,
Aaron Hoyt
Vantage Plastics
Aaron - what glitch does the one-off patch correct in 407A?

Thanks!
--Ari

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Aaron Hoyt
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:06 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] 803.407A



Heads up!
For anyone planning on upgrading to 407a patch in the near future,
please be sure to test Labor Entry (add new entry) and then get the
one-off patch from Epicor before you upgrade.
Otherwise we have been fairly happy with 407a.
Best of luck,
Aaron Hoyt
Vantage Plastics





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Ari,
An inability to enter labor through Labor Entry (error about this is a
duplicate entry when entering new time).
It's a big issue actually, but the fix is simple and painless (copy file
to folder, run conversion, don't even have to kick out users).
I am really hoping for a 407B with this fix in it, but I never hold my
breath.
Aaron

Ari Footlik wrote:
>
> Aaron - what glitch does the one-off patch correct in 407A?
>
> Thanks!
> --Ari
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> Behalf
> Of Aaron Hoyt
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:06 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] 803.407A
>
> Heads up!
> For anyone planning on upgrading to 407a patch in the near future,
> please be sure to test Labor Entry (add new entry) and then get the
> one-off patch from Epicor before you upgrade.
> Otherwise we have been fairly happy with 407a.
> Best of luck,
> Aaron Hoyt
> Vantage Plastics
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
What conversion did you have to run? I received the LaborEntry.dll. write.r file and Jcr60.r and no instruction to run a conversion.

Labor entry from MES also does not reduce shop load time.

Steve



--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Hoyt <aaron.hoyt@...> wrote:
>
> Ari,
> An inability to enter labor through Labor Entry (error about this is a
> duplicate entry when entering new time).
> It's a big issue actually, but the fix is simple and painless (copy file
> to folder, run conversion, don't even have to kick out users).
> I am really hoping for a 407B with this fix in it, but I never hold my
> breath.
> Aaron
>
> Ari Footlik wrote:
> >
> > Aaron - what glitch does the one-off patch correct in 407A?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > --Ari
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> > Behalf
> > Of Aaron Hoyt
> > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:06 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] 803.407A
> >
> > Heads up!
> > For anyone planning on upgrading to 407a patch in the near future,
> > please be sure to test Labor Entry (add new entry) and then get the
> > one-off patch from Epicor before you upgrade.
> > Otherwise we have been fairly happy with 407a.
> > Best of luck,
> > Aaron Hoyt
> > Vantage Plastics
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
One of our accountants is asking how to perform a "one-sided journal entry.".

I am not an accountant, so my questions are likely to make no more sense than my answers.

But, from what I understand, when she runs a trial balance, she is seeing an imbalance, and so I assume she is just trying to force a balance.

Does anyone have any comment, suggestion, or solution I can work with?



Thanks

Carey



_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Carey,

A one-sided journal entry is very easy. You must go into the company
settings and un-check to allow for unbalanced journal entries. Do the
journal entry (one side only) and re-check to NOT allow unbalanced
journal entries.

HTH!?

Dawn Balinski
Sr. Financial Analyst

Commercial Tool & Die, Inc.
5351 Rusche Drive NW
Comstock Park, MI 49321

Direct: 616-785-5728
Fax: 616-785-2955


________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Carey S
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 10:43 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] One-sided journal entry 803.404B




One of our accountants is asking how to perform a "one-sided journal
entry.".

I am not an accountant, so my questions are likely to make no more sense
than my answers.

But, from what I understand, when she runs a trial balance, she is
seeing an imbalance, and so I assume she is just trying to force a
balance.

Does anyone have any comment, suggestion, or solution I can work with?

Thanks

Carey

__________________________________________________________
Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_0320
09
<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032
009>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi Steve,

We just did this and we were instructed to run conversion 5460 after we
replaced the empbasic.r file

Don

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of vantage03
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 8:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 803.407A



What conversion did you have to run? I received the LaborEntry.dll.
write.r file and Jcr60.r and no instruction to run a conversion.

Labor entry from MES also does not reduce shop load time.

Steve

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
Aaron Hoyt <aaron.hoyt@...> wrote:
>
> Ari,
> An inability to enter labor through Labor Entry (error about this is a

> duplicate entry when entering new time).
> It's a big issue actually, but the fix is simple and painless (copy
file
> to folder, run conversion, don't even have to kick out users).
> I am really hoping for a 407B with this fix in it, but I never hold my

> breath.
> Aaron
>
> Ari Footlik wrote:
> >
> > Aaron - what glitch does the one-off patch correct in 407A?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > --Ari
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> > Behalf
> > Of Aaron Hoyt
> > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:06 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] 803.407A
> >
> > Heads up!
> > For anyone planning on upgrading to 407a patch in the near future,
> > please be sure to test Labor Entry (add new entry) and then get the
> > one-off patch from Epicor before you upgrade.
> > Otherwise we have been fairly happy with 407a.
> > Best of luck,
> > Aaron Hoyt
> > Vantage Plastics
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I am on progress are you? I also did not get the empbasic.r file.

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: Don Kollmann [mailto:dkollmann@...]
Sent: March 16, 2009 10:38 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: 803.407A


Hi Steve,

We just did this and we were instructed to run conversion 5460 after we
replaced the empbasic.r file

Don

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of vantage03
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 8:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 803.407A

What conversion did you have to run? I received the LaborEntry.dll.
write.r file and Jcr60.r and no instruction to run a conversion.

Labor entry from MES also does not reduce shop load time.

Steve

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
Aaron Hoyt <aaron.hoyt@...> wrote:
>
> Ari,
> An inability to enter labor through Labor Entry (error about this is a

> duplicate entry when entering new time).
> It's a big issue actually, but the fix is simple and painless (copy
file
> to folder, run conversion, don't even have to kick out users).
> I am really hoping for a 407B with this fix in it, but I never hold my

> breath.
> Aaron
>
> Ari Footlik wrote:
> >
> > Aaron - what glitch does the one-off patch correct in 407A?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > --Ari
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> > Behalf
> > Of Aaron Hoyt
> > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:06 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] 803.407A
> >
> > Heads up!
> > For anyone planning on upgrading to 407a patch in the near future,
> > please be sure to test Labor Entry (add new entry) and then get the
> > one-off patch from Epicor before you upgrade.
> > Otherwise we have been fairly happy with 407a.
> > Best of luck,
> > Aaron Hoyt
> > Vantage Plastics
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Are you Progress or SQL? We are Progess and received the Empbasic.r and instructions to 5460 Conversion. It seemed to fix the entery problem but our Labor Edit Report is now reporting dates outside the filtered dates.



--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "vantage03" <vantage@...> wrote:
>
> What conversion did you have to run? I received the LaborEntry.dll. write.r file and Jcr60.r and no instruction to run a conversion.
>
> Labor entry from MES also does not reduce shop load time.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Hoyt <aaron.hoyt@> wrote:
> >
> > Ari,
> > An inability to enter labor through Labor Entry (error about this is a
> > duplicate entry when entering new time).
> > It's a big issue actually, but the fix is simple and painless (copy file
> > to folder, run conversion, don't even have to kick out users).
> > I am really hoping for a 407B with this fix in it, but I never hold my
> > breath.
> > Aaron
> >
> > Ari Footlik wrote:
> > >
> > > Aaron - what glitch does the one-off patch correct in 407A?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > --Ari
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> > > Behalf
> > > Of Aaron Hoyt
> > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:06 PM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [Vantage] 803.407A
> > >
> > > Heads up!
> > > For anyone planning on upgrading to 407a patch in the near future,
> > > please be sure to test Labor Entry (add new entry) and then get the
> > > one-off patch from Epicor before you upgrade.
> > > Otherwise we have been fairly happy with 407a.
> > > Best of luck,
> > > Aaron Hoyt
> > > Vantage Plastics
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
I am on progress.

I think what the problem is there are to fixes out. There is the fix for
the labor entry (duplicate entry error) that you
received the Enpbasic.r and run 5460 and the other problem with laber does
not reduce on the jobs with laber entry or MES. This required
.....LaborEntry.dll, write.r and Jcr60.r.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: jpfinch1 [mailto:sway@...]
Sent: March 16, 2009 11:46 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 803.407A



Are you Progress or SQL? We are Progess and received the Empbasic.r and
instructions to 5460 Conversion. It seemed to fix the entery problem but our
Labor Edit Report is now reporting dates outside the filtered dates.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com,
"vantage03" <vantage@...> wrote:
>
> What conversion did you have to run? I received the LaborEntry.dll.
write.r file and Jcr60.r and no instruction to run a conversion.
>
> Labor entry from MES also does not reduce shop load time.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com, Aaron
Hoyt <aaron.hoyt@> wrote:
> >
> > Ari,
> > An inability to enter labor through Labor Entry (error about this is a
> > duplicate entry when entering new time).
> > It's a big issue actually, but the fix is simple and painless (copy file

> > to folder, run conversion, don't even have to kick out users).
> > I am really hoping for a 407B with this fix in it, but I never hold my
> > breath.
> > Aaron
> >
> > Ari Footlik wrote:
> > >
> > > Aaron - what glitch does the one-off patch correct in 407A?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > --Ari
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> > > Behalf
> > > Of Aaron Hoyt
> > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:06 PM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [Vantage] 803.407A
> > >
> > > Heads up!
> > > For anyone planning on upgrading to 407a patch in the near future,
> > > please be sure to test Labor Entry (add new entry) and then get the
> > > one-off patch from Epicor before you upgrade.
> > > Otherwise we have been fairly happy with 407a.
> > > Best of luck,
> > > Aaron Hoyt
> > > Vantage Plastics
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
A one side journal entry is a sure sign there is an unknown problem As a Controller I would recommend they NEVER be entered, but instead research the true cause of the problem. I don;t check this site often, so if you would like more information, please contact me directly

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Carey S <rotary1@...> wrote:
>
>
> One of our accountants is asking how to perform a "one-sided journal entry.".
>
> I am not an accountant, so my questions are likely to make no more sense than my answers.
>
> But, from what I understand, when she runs a trial balance, she is seeing an imbalance, and so I assume she is just trying to force a balance.
>
> Does anyone have any comment, suggestion, or solution I can work with?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Carey
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
> http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Of course, you should never get into a situation where a one-sided entry is necessary. Unless you are allowing one sided entries, Vantage/Vista will theoretically prevent them from happening. Theoretically is the operative word here, because that simply does not happen. Admittedly a rare occurrence judging by what I read in this exchange and my limited experience, they nonetheless occur. Once one out of balance entry has gotten in, if you ever want your GL to balance again, you have no choice but to make a one sided entry to correct the problem. You may even be able to research and find out what caused the problem, but you still have to fix the problem. As a Controller, I would recommend that one sided entries SHOULD be entered, but only in the rare case when the underlying system has created an out of balance condition. I also recommend that one should thoroughly research the problem, and identify the source before posting the one sided entry.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
F 425 491-8200
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electricmirror.com>


From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hattie Saulsberry
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B


A one side journal entry is a sure sign there is an unknown problem As a Controller I would recommend they NEVER be entered, but instead research the true cause of the problem. I don;t check this site often, so if you would like more information, please contact me directly

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Carey S <rotary1@...> wrote:
>
>
> One of our accountants is asking how to perform a "one-sided journal entry.".
>
> I am not an accountant, so my questions are likely to make no more sense than my answers.
>
> But, from what I understand, when she runs a trial balance, she is seeing an imbalance, and so I assume she is just trying to force a balance.
>
> Does anyone have any comment, suggestion, or solution I can work with?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Carey
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
> http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
You *can* turn this on in the Company config -> Finance -> General
Ledger -> Allow unbalanced manual journal entries.



-bws



--

Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix

bspolarich@... ~ 734-864-5618 ~
www.advancedphotonix.com



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Thomas Rose
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 5:20 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B



Of course, you should never get into a situation where a one-sided entry
is necessary. Unless you are allowing one sided entries, Vantage/Vista
will theoretically prevent them from happening. Theoretically is the
operative word here, because that simply does not happen. Admittedly a
rare occurrence judging by what I read in this exchange and my limited
experience, they nonetheless occur. Once one out of balance entry has
gotten in, if you ever want your GL to balance again, you have no choice
but to make a one sided entry to correct the problem. You may even be
able to research and find out what caused the problem, but you still
have to fix the problem. As a Controller, I would recommend that one
sided entries SHOULD be entered, but only in the rare case when the
underlying system has created an out of balance condition. I also
recommend that one should thoroughly research the problem, and identify
the source before posting the one sided entry.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
F 425 491-8200
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electricmirror.com>

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Hattie Saulsberry
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

A one side journal entry is a sure sign there is an unknown problem As a
Controller I would recommend they NEVER be entered, but instead research
the true cause of the problem. I don;t check this site often, so if you
would like more information, please contact me directly

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Carey S <rotary1@...> wrote:
>
>
> One of our accountants is asking how to perform a "one-sided journal
entry.".
>
> I am not an accountant, so my questions are likely to make no more
sense than my answers.
>
> But, from what I understand, when she runs a trial balance, she is
seeing an imbalance, and so I assume she is just trying to force a
balance.
>
> Does anyone have any comment, suggestion, or solution I can work with?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Carey
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
>
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_0320
09
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Thank you to everyone that has helped with this issue.

There is an underlying issue that seems to have identified itself as an imbalance.



We have scenarios where we must use order discounts. We advise our sales order people to not change the line price (item price) directly, but to leave the list price as is and then adjust the discount accordingly. However, for items that are no charge, the system prevents you from entering a full 100-percent discount. One of the invoices that seems to have caused this imbalance was for 2 hours of labor (but could easily be for parts). So, for 2x$100/HR, the line total will be $200. If it is actually not going to be charged, they simply enter the discount as a flat amount to get the invoice to reflect a zero total.



The imbalance was that the $0 order total hit the A/R detail journal.
However, the total discount of $200 hit the sales discount journal. This is what seems to have caused the balance.

So, maybe someone is able to see easily that there is a bug, or that there is a misstep in setup/procedure here.?



Please remember that accounting jargon is not my strongsuit. I hope this all makes sense.



Carey


To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
From: t.rose@...
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:20:29 -0700
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B





Of course, you should never get into a situation where a one-sided entry is necessary. Unless you are allowing one sided entries, Vantage/Vista will theoretically prevent them from happening. Theoretically is the operative word here, because that simply does not happen. Admittedly a rare occurrence judging by what I read in this exchange and my limited experience, they nonetheless occur. Once one out of balance entry has gotten in, if you ever want your GL to balance again, you have no choice but to make a one sided entry to correct the problem. You may even be able to research and find out what caused the problem, but you still have to fix the problem. As a Controller, I would recommend that one sided entries SHOULD be entered, but only in the rare case when the underlying system has created an out of balance condition. I also recommend that one should thoroughly research the problem, and identify the source before posting the one sided entry.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
F 425 491-8200
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electricmirror.com>

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hattie Saulsberry
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

A one side journal entry is a sure sign there is an unknown problem As a Controller I would recommend they NEVER be entered, but instead research the true cause of the problem. I don;t check this site often, so if you would like more information, please contact me directly

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Carey S <rotary1@...> wrote:
>
>
> One of our accountants is asking how to perform a "one-sided journal entry.".
>
> I am not an accountant, so my questions are likely to make no more sense than my answers.
>
> But, from what I understand, when she runs a trial balance, she is seeing an imbalance, and so I assume she is just trying to force a balance.
>
> Does anyone have any comment, suggestion, or solution I can work with?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Carey
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
> http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]









_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I'm not going to be able to say what is better in terms of the
accounting, but on the procedure side why not do this:

Go ahead and delete the line that will not be invoiced (or would get the
100% discount) then in the comments, make a note of what happened, why
the line was deleted, etc.

Unless there is a good way to take care of this from the accounting
side, why not look into something like this at least procedurally?

Just one idea....



M. Manasa Reddy
manasa@...
P: 630-806-2000
F: 630-806-2001


________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Carey S
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:49 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B




Thank you to everyone that has helped with this issue.

There is an underlying issue that seems to have identified itself as an
imbalance.

We have scenarios where we must use order discounts. We advise our sales
order people to not change the line price (item price) directly, but to
leave the list price as is and then adjust the discount accordingly.
However, for items that are no charge, the system prevents you from
entering a full 100-percent discount. One of the invoices that seems to
have caused this imbalance was for 2 hours of labor (but could easily be
for parts). So, for 2x$100/HR, the line total will be $200. If it is
actually not going to be charged, they simply enter the discount as a
flat amount to get the invoice to reflect a zero total.

The imbalance was that the $0 order total hit the A/R detail journal.
However, the total discount of $200 hit the sales discount journal. This
is what seems to have caused the balance.

So, maybe someone is able to see easily that there is a bug, or that
there is a misstep in setup/procedure here.?

Please remember that accounting jargon is not my strongsuit. I hope this
all makes sense.

Carey

To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
From: t.rose@... <mailto:t.rose%40electricmirror.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:20:29 -0700
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

Of course, you should never get into a situation where a one-sided entry
is necessary. Unless you are allowing one sided entries, Vantage/Vista
will theoretically prevent them from happening. Theoretically is the
operative word here, because that simply does not happen. Admittedly a
rare occurrence judging by what I read in this exchange and my limited
experience, they nonetheless occur. Once one out of balance entry has
gotten in, if you ever want your GL to balance again, you have no choice
but to make a one sided entry to correct the problem. You may even be
able to research and find out what caused the problem, but you still
have to fix the problem. As a Controller, I would recommend that one
sided entries SHOULD be entered, but only in the rare case when the
underlying system has created an out of balance condition. I also
recommend that one should thoroughly research the problem, and identify
the source before posting the one sided entry.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
F 425 491-8200
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electricmirror.com
<http://www.electricmirror.com> >

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Hattie Saulsberry
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

A one side journal entry is a sure sign there is an unknown problem As a
Controller I would recommend they NEVER be entered, but instead research
the true cause of the problem. I don;t check this site often, so if you
would like more information, please contact me directly

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Carey S <rotary1@...> wrote:
>
>
> One of our accountants is asking how to perform a "one-sided journal
entry.".
>
> I am not an accountant, so my questions are likely to make no more
sense than my answers.
>
> But, from what I understand, when she runs a trial balance, she is
seeing an imbalance, and so I assume she is just trying to force a
balance.
>
> Does anyone have any comment, suggestion, or solution I can work with?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Carey
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
>
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_0320
09
<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032
009>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__________________________________________________________
Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_0320
09
<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032
009>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
One reason I can think of is the sale of parts at full discount for good will or similar type reasons. By removing the line, I lose traceability of the part transaction...



Will continue to ponder though.

Thanks

Carey



To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
From: manasa@...
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:56:04 -0500
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B





I'm not going to be able to say what is better in terms of the
accounting, but on the procedure side why not do this:

Go ahead and delete the line that will not be invoiced (or would get the
100% discount) then in the comments, make a note of what happened, why
the line was deleted, etc.

Unless there is a good way to take care of this from the accounting
side, why not look into something like this at least procedurally?

Just one idea....



M. Manasa Reddy
manasa@...
P: 630-806-2000
F: 630-806-2001


________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Carey S
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:49 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

Thank you to everyone that has helped with this issue.

There is an underlying issue that seems to have identified itself as an
imbalance.

We have scenarios where we must use order discounts. We advise our sales
order people to not change the line price (item price) directly, but to
leave the list price as is and then adjust the discount accordingly.
However, for items that are no charge, the system prevents you from
entering a full 100-percent discount. One of the invoices that seems to
have caused this imbalance was for 2 hours of labor (but could easily be
for parts). So, for 2x$100/HR, the line total will be $200. If it is
actually not going to be charged, they simply enter the discount as a
flat amount to get the invoice to reflect a zero total.

The imbalance was that the $0 order total hit the A/R detail journal.
However, the total discount of $200 hit the sales discount journal. This
is what seems to have caused the balance.

So, maybe someone is able to see easily that there is a bug, or that
there is a misstep in setup/procedure here.?

Please remember that accounting jargon is not my strongsuit. I hope this
all makes sense.

Carey

To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
From: t.rose@... <mailto:t.rose%40electricmirror.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:20:29 -0700
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

Of course, you should never get into a situation where a one-sided entry
is necessary. Unless you are allowing one sided entries, Vantage/Vista
will theoretically prevent them from happening. Theoretically is the
operative word here, because that simply does not happen. Admittedly a
rare occurrence judging by what I read in this exchange and my limited
experience, they nonetheless occur. Once one out of balance entry has
gotten in, if you ever want your GL to balance again, you have no choice
but to make a one sided entry to correct the problem. You may even be
able to research and find out what caused the problem, but you still
have to fix the problem. As a Controller, I would recommend that one
sided entries SHOULD be entered, but only in the rare case when the
underlying system has created an out of balance condition. I also
recommend that one should thoroughly research the problem, and identify
the source before posting the one sided entry.

Thom Rose
Controller
Electric Mirror LLC
HOTEL LUXURY

"The World Leader in Back-lit Mirrors & Mirror TV Technology"

T 425 776-4946
F 425 491-8200
A 11831 Beverly Park Rd, Bldg D, Everett, WA 98204 USA
www.electricmirror.com<http://www.electricmirror.com
<http://www.electricmirror.com> >

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Hattie Saulsberry
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: One-sided journal entry 803.404B

A one side journal entry is a sure sign there is an unknown problem As a
Controller I would recommend they NEVER be entered, but instead research
the true cause of the problem. I don;t check this site often, so if you
would like more information, please contact me directly

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Carey S <rotary1@...> wrote:
>
>
> One of our accountants is asking how to perform a "one-sided journal
entry.".
>
> I am not an accountant, so my questions are likely to make no more
sense than my answers.
>
> But, from what I understand, when she runs a trial balance, she is
seeing an imbalance, and so I assume she is just trying to force a
balance.
>
> Does anyone have any comment, suggestion, or solution I can work with?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Carey
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
>
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_0320
09
<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032
009>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__________________________________________________________
Hotmail(r) is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_0320
09
<http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032
009>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]









_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live� Groups: Create an online spot for your favorite groups to meet.
http://windowslive.com/online/groups?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_groups_032009

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]