New Location of Part Transactions

Yahoo Archive
1
I screwed up!! I found them right where they should be, sorry.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Stetter [mailto:jimstetter@...]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 10:05 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] New Location of Part Transactions
>
>
> Darren,
>
> When did you upgrade to V5? Are you using a Report Builder report to
> determine that the last transaction was 1/2/2001? If so, did
> you change the
> report to point to the V5 database? Just grasping at straws here.
>
> Jim S
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Mann [mailto:dmann@...]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:39 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] New Location of Part Transactions
>
>
> No, the date is correct on my servers.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-~>
> eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
> Click here for more details
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/kWP7PD/pYNCAA/4ihDAA/P0AVlB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
2
I am trying to find the table/file that contains the inventory transactions.
The Parttran shows only transactions up to Jan 2, 2001. Thus it must have
been changed. We are currently using ( I use that term loosely) 5.00.310.

Apparently, our major problems with make-to-stock jobs was caused by not
fully applying each patch in the early stages. It seems from what I was
told that the patched DO rely on each other. I applied all current (as of
1/22/01) patches then got into eMfg causing some processing not to take
place that was needed for conversion. One of those undocumented problems,
even the patches themselves only ask that you are using 5.00.301 not
reflecting this interdependence. Usually patches are all inclusive, the
files maybe but not the programs executed after the patch. BE CAREFUL.

Anyhow they basically said I am on my own because they are afraid if they
try to write a fix they will mess up current info. Seems lame that they
can't right a program to adjust jobs that were open during the conversion.
I sent the database so maybe something will come of it if I'm still here, my
job has been threatened over this one and I have three days to figure out
the problem with no source code.

The bug that didn't get fixed basically ignores material costs associated
with MFG receipts ( we autorecieve to inventory ) created prior to the
conversion to 5.0 and when the job is costed it creates a huge variance for
the material. Probably related to why I can't find the damn part
transactions file, it can't either!!!!!

Does anyone know what other transactions are created when the job is closed?
My biggest concern is that AVE cost has been affected. That would be a
difficult one to repair.

Regards,

Darren Mann
Miller Products Co.
3
Darren,

You might want to go check the date on your server. I bet you will find the
system date is not 2/23/2001 but perhaps 2/23/2000. That's why your
transactions aren't appearing like you expect. That could also explain the
problem with jobs you are seeing.

Regards
Jim Stetter

-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Mann [mailto:dmann@...]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 12:18 PM
To: Vantage User Group (E-mail)
Subject: [Vantage] New Location of Part Transactions


I am trying to find the table/file that contains the inventory
transactions.
The Parttran shows only transactions up to Jan 2, 2001. Thus it must have
been changed. We are currently using ( I use that term loosely) 5.00.310.

Apparently, our major problems with make-to-stock jobs was caused by not
fully applying each patch in the early stages. It seems from what I was
told that the patched DO rely on each other. I applied all current (as of
1/22/01) patches then got into eMfg causing some processing not to take
place that was needed for conversion. One of those undocumented problems,
even the patches themselves only ask that you are using 5.00.301 not
reflecting this interdependence. Usually patches are all inclusive, the
files maybe but not the programs executed after the patch. BE CAREFUL.

Anyhow they basically said I am on my own because they are afraid if they
try to write a fix they will mess up current info. Seems lame that they
can't right a program to adjust jobs that were open during the conversion.
I sent the database so maybe something will come of it if I'm still here,
my
job has been threatened over this one and I have three days to figure out
the problem with no source code.

The bug that didn't get fixed basically ignores material costs associated
with MFG receipts ( we autorecieve to inventory ) created prior to the
conversion to 5.0 and when the job is costed it creates a huge variance
for
the material. Probably related to why I can't find the damn part
transactions file, it can't either!!!!!

Does anyone know what other transactions are created when the job is
closed?
My biggest concern is that AVE cost has been affected. That would be a
difficult one to repair.

Regards,

Darren Mann
Miller Products Co.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4
No, the date is correct on my servers.

Thanks

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Stetter [mailto:jimstetter@...]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 1:03 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] New Location of Part Transactions
>
>
> Darren,
>
> You might want to go check the date on your server. I bet
> you will find the
> system date is not 2/23/2001 but perhaps 2/23/2000. That's why your
> transactions aren't appearing like you expect. That could
> also explain the
> problem with jobs you are seeing.
>
> Regards
> Jim Stetter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Mann [mailto:dmann@...]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 12:18 PM
> To: Vantage User Group (E-mail)
> Subject: [Vantage] New Location of Part Transactions
>
>
> I am trying to find the table/file that contains the inventory
> transactions.
> The Parttran shows only transactions up to Jan 2, 2001.
> Thus it must have
> been changed. We are currently using ( I use that term
> loosely) 5.00.310.
>
> Apparently, our major problems with make-to-stock jobs was
> caused by not
> fully applying each patch in the early stages. It seems
> from what I was
> told that the patched DO rely on each other. I applied all
> current (as of
> 1/22/01) patches then got into eMfg causing some processing
> not to take
> place that was needed for conversion. One of those
> undocumented problems,
> even the patches themselves only ask that you are using 5.00.301 not
> reflecting this interdependence. Usually patches are all
> inclusive, the
> files maybe but not the programs executed after the patch.
> BE CAREFUL.
>
> Anyhow they basically said I am on my own because they are
> afraid if they
> try to write a fix they will mess up current info. Seems
> lame that they
> can't right a program to adjust jobs that were open during
> the conversion.
> I sent the database so maybe something will come of it if
> I'm still here,
> my
> job has been threatened over this one and I have three days
> to figure out
> the problem with no source code.
>
> The bug that didn't get fixed basically ignores material
> costs associated
> with MFG receipts ( we autorecieve to inventory ) created
> prior to the
> conversion to 5.0 and when the job is costed it creates a
> huge variance
> for
> the material. Probably related to why I can't find the damn part
> transactions file, it can't either!!!!!
>
> Does anyone know what other transactions are created when the job is
> closed?
> My biggest concern is that AVE cost has been affected.
> That would be a
> difficult one to repair.
>
> Regards,
>
> Darren Mann
> Miller Products Co.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-~>
> eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
> Click here for more details
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/kWP7PD/pYNCAA/4ihDAA/P0AVlB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
5
Darren,

When did you upgrade to V5? Are you using a Report Builder report to
determine that the last transaction was 1/2/2001? If so, did you change the
report to point to the V5 database? Just grasping at straws here.

Jim S
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Mann [mailto:dmann@...]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:39 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] New Location of Part Transactions


No, the date is correct on my servers.

Thanks




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]