Judge rules current AI’s don’t qualify for copyrighting their works and quotes poetry from Star Trek’s Data in ruling. However FTA: “If AI ever reached Data levels of intelligence, Millett suggested that copyright laws could shift to grant copyrights to AI-authored works. But that time is apparently not now.”
Who flipped the first letter of my last name? WRONG.
What a nut case. If you think your AI is sentient enough that it deserves copyright for its works, let it argue its own case. Hope it costs enough to dissuade other people from wasting any more legal resources.
Also, let’s discuss it scraping absolutely everything copyrighted without permission… Let’s go down that road.
Oh my, this thread is going to turn into a…
Its off topic… that’s what this category is for!
I’m assuming if you had to pay damages in cases of AI copywrite infringement it would have to be paid in crypto.
This discussion feels like this. .
I don’t think I’ve ever had as much fun being alive as a dog
We are finally dipping our toe into these tools at work for a serious project and we thought the safest bet is to use the image generator
After many hours of “prompt engineering” by me and @hmwillett we thought we had it locked.
Then we went to do an end user demo of the product which requires the user to click a button to generate an image
Here’s the prompt after much testing and trial and error
“Generate A single, real animal that currently exists in the world, depicted in a photorealistic style. The animal must be a known species that exists today, such as a mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian, or fish. The animal should appear in a natural habitat, with realistic colors, textures, and proportions. No extinct, mythical, or fictional animals. No text or labels on the image”
So the user clicks the button ready to see her animal and the Ai replies with
That’s fantastic lol.
It only went downhill from there.
The puzzled look on the CFO wasn’t as fantastic
Disagree.