I though about that. But my query above only limits the TranNum >= 208700. So it should have shown anyway. (Unlike the Part Transaction History Tracker - which uses a cutoff date).
Also Tran 208707 was actuall line 2 of the Packer. So the missing trans (208705 and 06) would have been from the same packer and created at the same time.
It is sad but true, you may find their are unused and duplicated transaction numbers. I know this through analysis of my company’s PartTran table entries. I believe these transaction numbering errors are related to either App Server hangs or crashes. Carl