OK. I tried LaborHed.Seq, LaborDtl.Seq & EmpID all together, that didn't do it.
I ran a trace:
<tracePacket>
<businessObject>Epicor.Mfg.BO.Company</businessObject>
<methodName>GetByID</methodName>
<returnType>Epicor.Mfg.BO.CompanyDataSet</returnType>
<localTime>12/22/2011 15:07:30:4842400 PM</localTime>
<executionTime>55.0055</executionTime>
<parameters>
<parameter name='company' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[ACT]]></parameter>
</parameters>
</tracePacket>
<tracePacket>
<businessObject>Epicor.Mfg.BO.EmpBasic</businessObject>
<methodName>GetByID</methodName>
<returnType>Epicor.Mfg.BO.EmpBasicDataSet</returnType>
<localTime>12/22/2011 15:07:32:5354451 PM</localTime>
<executionTime>18.0018</executionTime>
<parameters>
<parameter name='empID' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[1226]]></parameter>
</parameters>
</tracePacket>
<tracePacket>
<businessObject>Epicor.Mfg.BO.Labor</businessObject>
<methodName>GetRows</methodName>
<returnType>Epicor.Mfg.BO.LaborDataSet</returnType>
<localTime>12/22/2011 15:07:36:0837999 PM</localTime>
<executionTime>20.002</executionTime>
<parameters>
<parameter name='whereClauseLaborHed' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[EmployeeNum = '1226' AND PayrollDate = '12/20/2011' BY PayrollDate]]></parameter>
<parameter name='whereClauseLaborDtl' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[]]></parameter>
<parameter name='whereClauseLaborPart' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[]]></parameter>
<parameter name='pageSize' type='System.Int32' ><![CDATA[0]]></parameter>
<parameter name='absolutePage' type='System.Int32' ><![CDATA[0]]></parameter>
<parameter name='morePages' type='System.Boolean' ><![CDATA[]]></parameter>
</parameters>
</tracePacket>
Then tried:
Company.Company
EmpBasic.EmpID
LaborHed.EmployeeNum &
LaborHed.PayrollDate
That didn't do it..Also tried the above combo without the Company table, that didn't do it either.
Pretty stuck here.
I ran a trace:
<tracePacket>
<businessObject>Epicor.Mfg.BO.Company</businessObject>
<methodName>GetByID</methodName>
<returnType>Epicor.Mfg.BO.CompanyDataSet</returnType>
<localTime>12/22/2011 15:07:30:4842400 PM</localTime>
<executionTime>55.0055</executionTime>
<parameters>
<parameter name='company' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[ACT]]></parameter>
</parameters>
</tracePacket>
<tracePacket>
<businessObject>Epicor.Mfg.BO.EmpBasic</businessObject>
<methodName>GetByID</methodName>
<returnType>Epicor.Mfg.BO.EmpBasicDataSet</returnType>
<localTime>12/22/2011 15:07:32:5354451 PM</localTime>
<executionTime>18.0018</executionTime>
<parameters>
<parameter name='empID' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[1226]]></parameter>
</parameters>
</tracePacket>
<tracePacket>
<businessObject>Epicor.Mfg.BO.Labor</businessObject>
<methodName>GetRows</methodName>
<returnType>Epicor.Mfg.BO.LaborDataSet</returnType>
<localTime>12/22/2011 15:07:36:0837999 PM</localTime>
<executionTime>20.002</executionTime>
<parameters>
<parameter name='whereClauseLaborHed' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[EmployeeNum = '1226' AND PayrollDate = '12/20/2011' BY PayrollDate]]></parameter>
<parameter name='whereClauseLaborDtl' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[]]></parameter>
<parameter name='whereClauseLaborPart' type='System.String' ><![CDATA[]]></parameter>
<parameter name='pageSize' type='System.Int32' ><![CDATA[0]]></parameter>
<parameter name='absolutePage' type='System.Int32' ><![CDATA[0]]></parameter>
<parameter name='morePages' type='System.Boolean' ><![CDATA[]]></parameter>
</parameters>
</tracePacket>
Then tried:
Company.Company
EmpBasic.EmpID
LaborHed.EmployeeNum &
LaborHed.PayrollDate
That didn't do it..Also tried the above combo without the Company table, that didn't do it either.
Pretty stuck here.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Rob Bucek <rbucek@...> wrote:
>
> Usually when i'm doing a work flow for labor, its laborhed.seq, labordtl.seq, and empid...try doing a trace (full data set)..see what that reveals
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Phone
>
>
> -----Original message-----
> From: "crystal.council@..." <crystal.council@...>
> To: "vantage@yahoogroups.com" <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Fri, Dec 23, 2011 17:48:24 GMT+00:00
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Labor Entry Dashboard
>
>
>
> Yeah, same error message. I would have thought either or both of those would have been it too. They certainly seem like key lookup fields. Starting to wonder if it's not the fields I'm publishing but rather something unique to the LaborEntry form?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Rob Bucek <rbucek@> wrote:
> >
> > Did you try laborhed.seq along with labordtl.seq?
> >
> > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Phone
> >
> >
> > -----Original message-----
> > From: "crystal.council@" <crystal.council@>
> > To: "vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>" <vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>>
> > Sent: Fri, Dec 23, 2011 17:23:06 GMT+00:00
> > Subject: [Vantage] Labor Entry Dashboard
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm trying to add a dashboard to the Labor Entry menu, the dashboard is a BAQ of the previous day's labor records. I would like the dashboard to publish to the menu so I can pull up an employee's records quickly and easily. However, whenever I try to publish to the menu I get the same error. I've tried publishing a multitude of fields and combinations of fields and yet everything returns the same error when I select a row in the dashboard. The error is:
> >
> > Error Detail
> > ============
> > Failed to Auto-Search; Possible invalid primary adapter defined for Epicor.Mfg.UI.LaborEntry
> >
> > Inner Exception
> > ===============
> > Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
> >
> > Inner Stack Trace
> > =================
> > at Epicor.Mfg.UI.FrameWork.EpiBaseForm.autoSubscriberSearch()
> >
> > Any ideas? I'm not sure if I'm publishing the correct field(s) to pull a records. I've tried all combinations of:
> > EmpBasic.EmpID
> > LaborHed.PayrollDate
> > LaborDtl.LaborDtlSeq
> > ...and a few others just as shots in the dark...
> >
> > Still can't get it to work. Any ideas would be appreciated! This could potentially save some of our managers HOURS each week sifting through employee clockins.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>