Disappointed that so many of my ideas are marked not planning to implement. I still want all of these things and think they would have value to a lot of other users as well. There are plenty of ideas on the site marked delivered/in development that have only 1 or 2 votes, so I don’t think these were rejected for low vote count. It sure would be nice if there were any explanation of the reasoning why none of these will be done.
Totally agree with all of these. Yet we are supposed to get excited because they moved some fields around on the kinetic screens? When that is literally the EASIEST (if not the only easy) thing to do in app studio?
Ok, I’m a developer, so I’m going to have to push back a bit on this one.
While that may be the easiest thing they can do, it doesn’t mean it’s easy.
Lots of discussions on architecture, ease of use, dev testing, user testing,
feedback etc, all has to occur.
The Epicor world is a lot bigger world than all of us loudmouths over here.
That’s not to say I wouldn’t like more information into the development process,
the architecture, usability discussions. Transparency is almost always good.
Granted. But my point is that I personally would rather that development effort be spent on the things I can’t easily change on my own, like the things on Patrick’s list.