Job suggestions to qty zero

We have a zero in the planning time fence on the part plant tab and at the part class. Since we have one plant we did not have a plant on the class. We selected one now and will see if it makes a difference.



________________________________
From: Miguel Santillan <msantillan@...>
To: "vantage@yahoogroups.com" <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 3:21 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero


Â
Perhaps your Planning Time Fence on your Part > Plant is set and if not, then your Part Class has a Planning Time Fence as well

Miguel A. Santillan
Compass Components, Inc.


From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 9:13 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero



The jobs are not linked but what you are talking about below is what I am seeing in job suggestions. Once it suggests the reduction it goes crazy. Some one else suggested it may be a part rev issue and since we have "use part rev" checked on our part entry that may indeed cause it. Thanks for the reply.

________________________________
From: Len Hartka <mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com<mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com>>
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 6:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero


Good Day Diane:

I see that with PO's when the system wants to re-schedule a PO.
There is one entry zeroing it out, then another entry putting it back in
with the 'needed' date. If the PO has the Qty and date locked, I have
seen it do many odd things, including ordering more some that we do not
need. MRP simply cannot handle all the constraints.

Is there another suggestion to add it back in with a different date
- it would show up in Time-phase screen - Any chance that someone may
have deleted a suggestion after MRP ran?

However, if the JOB is linked to a SO-Line, then the logic is
completely different.

Len

Leonard C. Hartka, IS Project Manager\ERP Specialist
Sun Automation Group
66 Loveton Circle
Sparks, Md. 21152
410-329-3560 ext. 120
410-329-3564 FAX
443-255-7192 Work Cell
mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com

http://www.sunautomation.com/ <http://www.sunautomation.com/>

________________________________

From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:27 PM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and
creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway
through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These
items are make to stock.

Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These items are make to stock.
Â
Â
Â
Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Diane, nothing off hand that I have heard. Which release are you on?
Â
Also, do you have any days of supply set for these parts and/or has something changed on the demand side such as the sales order line being changed, perhaps with a new revision?


________________________________
From: Diane Pedersen <dpedersen5074@...>
To: "vantage@yahoogroups.com" <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 5:26 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero


Â
    Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These items are make to stock.
Â
Â
Â
Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We are on 904.506. We removed all the days of suppy and short horizon planning at the suggestion of Epcior a few months ago. All of my sales order demand is for rev A and my current rev is B on all my jobs. When the sales orders were loaded we were at A. If we have to keep that in sinc I am in serious trouble since jobs are to inventory and ship against the first sales order demand.



________________________________
From: Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@...>
To: "vantage@yahoogroups.com" <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero


Â
Diane, nothing off hand that I have heard. Which release are you on?
Â
Also, do you have any days of supply set for these parts and/or has something changed on the demand side such as the sales order line being changed, perhaps with a new revision?

________________________________
From: Diane Pedersen <mailto:dpedersen5074%40yahoo.com>
To: "mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com" <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 5:26 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

Â
    Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These items are make to stock.
Â
Â
Â
Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I dont understand the suggestion to remove the days of supply. Plus when you say the sales order were loaded I am not sure what that means other than you brought sales orders in using the DMT or other from which we have seen conversion issues. Suggestions will always be against the most recent demand for that revision. Unless you lock the job MRP will want to suggest a new demand based on the sales order revision
Â
If you want to contact me off line send me an email and lets look at it


________________________________
From: Diane Pedersen <dpedersen5074@...>
To: "vantage@yahoogroups.com" <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero


Â
We are on 904.506. We removed all the days of suppy and short horizon planning at the suggestion of Epcior a few months ago. All of my sales order demand is for rev A and my current rev is B on all my jobs. When the sales orders were loaded we were at A. If we have to keep that in sinc I am in serious trouble since jobs are to inventory and ship against the first sales order demand.

________________________________
From: Mark Wagner <mailto:mjfw2003%40yahoo.com>
To: "mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com" <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

Â
Diane, nothing off hand that I have heard. Which release are you on?
Â
Also, do you have any days of supply set for these parts and/or has something changed on the demand side such as the sales order line being changed, perhaps with a new revision?

________________________________
From: Diane Pedersen <mailto:dpedersen5074%40yahoo.com>
To: "mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com" <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2012 5:26 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

Â
    Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These items are make to stock.
Â
Â
Â
Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Good Day Diane:

I see that with PO's when the system wants to re-schedule a PO.
There is one entry zeroing it out, then another entry putting it back in
with the 'needed' date. If the PO has the Qty and date locked, I have
seen it do many odd things, including ordering more some that we do not
need. MRP simply cannot handle all the constraints.

Is there another suggestion to add it back in with a different date
- it would show up in Time-phase screen - Any chance that someone may
have deleted a suggestion after MRP ran?

However, if the JOB is linked to a SO-Line, then the logic is
completely different.


Len

Leonard C. Hartka, IS Project Manager\ERP Specialist
Sun Automation Group
66 Loveton Circle
Sparks, Md. 21152
410-329-3560 ext. 120
410-329-3564 FAX
443-255-7192 Work Cell
len.hartka@...

www.Sunautomation.com <http://www.sunautomation.com/>



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:27 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero




Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and
creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway
through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These
items are make to stock.



Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The jobs are not linked but what you are talking about below is what I am seeing in job suggestions. Once it suggests the reduction it goes crazy. Some one else suggested it may be a part rev issue and since we have "use part rev" checked on our part entry that may indeed cause it. Thanks for the reply.



________________________________
From: Len Hartka <len.hartka@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 6:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero


Â
Good Day Diane:

I see that with PO's when the system wants to re-schedule a PO.
There is one entry zeroing it out, then another entry putting it back in
with the 'needed' date. If the PO has the Qty and date locked, I have
seen it do many odd things, including ordering more some that we do not
need. MRP simply cannot handle all the constraints.

Is there another suggestion to add it back in with a different date
- it would show up in Time-phase screen - Any chance that someone may
have deleted a suggestion after MRP ran?

However, if the JOB is linked to a SO-Line, then the logic is
completely different.


Len

Leonard C. Hartka, IS Project Manager\ERP Specialist
Sun Automation Group
66 Loveton Circle
Sparks, Md. 21152
410-329-3560 ext. 120
410-329-3564 FAX
443-255-7192 Work Cell
mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com

http://www.sunautomation.com/ <http://www.sunautomation.com/>

________________________________

From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:27 PM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and
creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway
through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These
items are make to stock.



Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Good Day Diane:

Are yuour JOB's marked "qty locked"? ( or it may be "Date Locked" -
on PO's you can do both on the release TAb.


Len

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 12:13 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero




The jobs are not linked but what you are talking about below is what I
am seeing in job suggestions. Once it suggests the reduction it goes
crazy. Some one else suggested it may be a part rev issue and since we
have "use part rev" checked on our part entry that may indeed cause it.
Thanks for the reply.

________________________________
From: Len Hartka <len.hartka@...
<mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 6:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero


Good Day Diane:

I see that with PO's when the system wants to re-schedule a PO.
There is one entry zeroing it out, then another entry putting it back in
with the 'needed' date. If the PO has the Qty and date locked, I have
seen it do many odd things, including ordering more some that we do not
need. MRP simply cannot handle all the constraints.

Is there another suggestion to add it back in with a different date
- it would show up in Time-phase screen - Any chance that someone may
have deleted a suggestion after MRP ran?

However, if the JOB is linked to a SO-Line, then the logic is
completely different.

Len

Leonard C. Hartka, IS Project Manager\ERP Specialist
Sun Automation Group
66 Loveton Circle
Sparks, Md. 21152
410-329-3560 ext. 120
410-329-3564 FAX
443-255-7192 Work Cell
mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com

http://www.sunautomation.com/ <http://www.sunautomation.com/>

________________________________

From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:27 PM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and
creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway
through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These
items are make to stock.

Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and
then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this
message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged
to protect against viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Perhaps your Planning Time Fence on your Part > Plant is set and if not, then your Part Class has a Planning Time Fence as well

Miguel A. Santillan
Compass Components, Inc.


From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 9:13 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero



The jobs are not linked but what you are talking about below is what I am seeing in job suggestions. Once it suggests the reduction it goes crazy. Some one else suggested it may be a part rev issue and since we have "use part rev" checked on our part entry that may indeed cause it. Thanks for the reply.

________________________________
From: Len Hartka <len.hartka@...<mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com>>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 6:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero


Good Day Diane:

I see that with PO's when the system wants to re-schedule a PO.
There is one entry zeroing it out, then another entry putting it back in
with the 'needed' date. If the PO has the Qty and date locked, I have
seen it do many odd things, including ordering more some that we do not
need. MRP simply cannot handle all the constraints.

Is there another suggestion to add it back in with a different date
- it would show up in Time-phase screen - Any chance that someone may
have deleted a suggestion after MRP ran?

However, if the JOB is linked to a SO-Line, then the logic is
completely different.

Len

Leonard C. Hartka, IS Project Manager\ERP Specialist
Sun Automation Group
66 Loveton Circle
Sparks, Md. 21152
410-329-3560 ext. 120
410-329-3564 FAX
443-255-7192 Work Cell
mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com

http://www.sunautomation.com/ <http://www.sunautomation.com/>

________________________________

From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:27 PM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and
creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway
through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These
items are make to stock.

Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
These jobs are not locked in qty or date. I will do some testing with lock qty since all our jobs are qty 1. I will have to make sure I can report a qty of 2 when we have to start the job over.



________________________________
From: Len Hartka <len.hartka@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero


Â
Good Day Diane:

Are yuour JOB's marked "qty locked"? ( or it may be "Date Locked" -
on PO's you can do both on the release TAb.


Len

________________________________

From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 12:13 PM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

The jobs are not linked but what you are talking about below is what I
am seeing in job suggestions. Once it suggests the reduction it goes
crazy. Some one else suggested it may be a part rev issue and since we
have "use part rev" checked on our part entry that may indeed cause it.
Thanks for the reply.

________________________________
From: Len Hartka <mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com
<mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com> >
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 6:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

Good Day Diane:

I see that with PO's when the system wants to re-schedule a PO.
There is one entry zeroing it out, then another entry putting it back in
with the 'needed' date. If the PO has the Qty and date locked, I have
seen it do many odd things, including ordering more some that we do not
need. MRP simply cannot handle all the constraints.

Is there another suggestion to add it back in with a different date
- it would show up in Time-phase screen - Any chance that someone may
have deleted a suggestion after MRP ran?

However, if the JOB is linked to a SO-Line, then the logic is
completely different.

Len

Leonard C. Hartka, IS Project Manager\ERP Specialist
Sun Automation Group
66 Loveton Circle
Sparks, Md. 21152
410-329-3560 ext. 120
410-329-3564 FAX
443-255-7192 Work Cell
mailto:len.hartka%40sunautomation.com

http://www.sunautomation.com/ <http://www.sunautomation.com/>

________________________________

From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Diane Pedersen
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:27 PM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Job suggestions to qty zero

Is anyone getting job suggestions to reduce the job to zero and
creating new unfirm jobs to replace them? These jobs are halfway
through the manufacturing process and have sales order demand. These
items are make to stock.

Diane Pedersen
Supply Chain Analyst
Triumph Composite systems

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and
then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this
message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged
to protect against viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]