On Friday, it’s EpiUsers Frideas Day! Have you been to the Epicor Ideas Portal recently? If so, are there some ideas you want to encourage other users to vote for? Maybe want to add comments to an existing idea?
Just noticed this wasn’t kicked off yet, but I’ve seen a lot of Ideas posted this week. Pull 'em all in and get your votes!
Finally getting around to posting mine:
KIN-I-5583 - Closed\Completed Jobs Show up in Job Status Maintenance Search
https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-5583
KIN-I-3528 - Ability to rearrange or sort favorites
https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-3528
KIN-I-4504 - No time phased requirements for sales kits
https://epicor-manufacturing.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-4504
KIN-I-5588 - Optional Setting: “Unfirm” jobs should not generate purchasing demands for materials on the job that aren’t in stock
https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-5588
That one is expired. Need to create it again.
Here are a couple I’ve submitted that I’m hoping others might find helpful.
KIN-I-5407 - Allow Production Yield Recalculation to Also Make Upward (Increase) Adjustments
KIN-I-5047 - Allow Override of PCID During Picking When Outbound Container is Enabled
Still campaigning for this to get fixed.
https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-5361
At a minimum the site should inherit from the context of the rest caller not the context of the site the user last logged into.
Thanks @aosemwengie1
I missed that, I’ve created the new idea and updated my post:
Optional Setting: “Unfirm” jobs should not | Epicor Ideas Portal (aha.io)
Also transfer order workbench remains completely unusable without the standard search button that literally every other application has:
https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-5222
Simply cannot understand the refusal to address this issue.
Ever tried to chase down what is happening with your system emails, but unfortunately you can’t because every record in the mail log only has a DATE and no TIME?
https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-5305
https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-4409
It’s not just the baq home page, but also the application studio home pages, and maybe others too. I need to know what company I am in. These screens are NOT company agnostic and to hide this information is a huge problem.
Almost 200 votes and Epicor has still declined to address the missing part landing page in 2024.2. Not sure how many epicor users it takes.
https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-4971
Or if you are in the “against” camp, then vote for this one instead:
https://epicor.ideas.aha.io/ideas/KIN-I-4452
Southern Hemisphere? 
Must be on the same schedule with the cloud customer portal which was also supposed to be coming “this summer”
I’d be happy with a sympathy session first. We don’t want another Landing Page controversy. Gather input, talk to the users, find the pain points in working in a Pet Builder world and let’s build tools that will encourage users to upgrade easier and more often.
Yes, talk to us. We were told the part landing page was pulled due to user feedback which apparently came from a few hand-selected users deemed important enough to listen to. What about the rest of us?
I have several users that are really struggling with Kinetic UI just because of little but critical UI features like Grid Filters in Kinetic. In some cases they can’t even run their reports properly since these filters are missing.
KNTC-I-3040 - Multi Select on Grid Filters
Multi Select on Grid Filters | Epicor Ideas Portal (aha.io)
This one is similar and worth your vote!
KIN-I-4178 - Add the ability to customize and apply multiple filters in grids.
Add the ability to customize and apply | Epicor Kinetic Ideas Portal (aha.io)
Lots of great ideas this Friday!
Not mine, but I’m on board.
This one would allow you have have “System.Object” as an input and output to your functions.
This would let you use any “Serializable” object from rest, as well as “any” object for internal calls.
And then you just cast the object as the type you expect it to be and run with it?
