That was a very frustrating experience for me also when I first started
developing our Configurator's. One thing I did recently was write a
shell program that basically sends keystrokes and mouse clicks to the
configurator for doing object layouts and rules entry. it has saved us
tons of time, especially since I can start this program running before I
go home, and hopefully it didn't mess up when it was running. Our
situation is kind of unique though as we are adding 'Verification pages'
at the end of the configurators which allow the users to see the exact
options they will receive. All of the code for the pages are pretty
much the same to begin with, so that allowed me to set the shells up to
just do the repetitive parts.
if you are familiar with VB coding, you can petty much do the same thing
though if you have a bunch of stuff to add. My main reason I couldn't
just copy the first one we did was all of these are page additions, not
new configurators. When we get to making new configurators again, we
will just copy the old ones over and modify them.
Paul Millsaps
Time Manufacturing
254.399.2170
paulm@... <mailto:paulm@...>
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and
notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
intended recipient.
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Gotschall
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:31 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Faster way to enter Product Configurator Rules
I agree, its not the best interface in the world, but I've seen worse.
I haven't found any way to add a "batch" of rules. I personally prefer
staying out of the Configurator rules and modifying the Method when I
can.. In most cases I can set a "keep when" rule on the operation and
not have to set anything on the materials under the operation since if
the operation is not used then the materials for the operation don't get
used. If I need to change the materials or quantities under an
operation, then I can do this in the method and I don't have to change
the rules in the configurator.
One thing I do that might be considered out of the norm is that I have a
set of operations for each product in our configurator. Lets take
chairs for an example. We may make 30 different models of chairs.
Instead of having one set of operations in the super BOM for the
configurator and doing keep when rules on the materials, I have 30
different sets of operations. The first model of chair has operations
10 through 190, the second model has operations of 200 through 390, etc.
This way, when chair model xxx is selected, I only have to keep
operations xxx through xxx and discard the rest. The downside to this
is that you are duplicating operations many times with different op
numbers.
----- Original Message ----
From: Calvin Krusen <ckrusen@... <mailto:ckrusen%40comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 3:54:40 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Faster way to enter Product Configurator Rules
Is there a quicker way to enter the product configurator rules?
It doesn't allow the Copy & Paste function in the Rules grid. Actually
it allows the Copy function, but not the Paste.
It would work better for me if the default for each material was to NOT
be included, and only rules that explicty call for the component would
add it. I like to put 'potential' components in a Part's method, and
set the Keep When rule to 'false'. Then if I ever need use them in the
future, I only need modify the Configurator, and don't have to touch
the BOM/MOM.
Are there any "tricks" to make better use of the Product Configurator' s
horrible user interface?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
developing our Configurator's. One thing I did recently was write a
shell program that basically sends keystrokes and mouse clicks to the
configurator for doing object layouts and rules entry. it has saved us
tons of time, especially since I can start this program running before I
go home, and hopefully it didn't mess up when it was running. Our
situation is kind of unique though as we are adding 'Verification pages'
at the end of the configurators which allow the users to see the exact
options they will receive. All of the code for the pages are pretty
much the same to begin with, so that allowed me to set the shells up to
just do the repetitive parts.
if you are familiar with VB coding, you can petty much do the same thing
though if you have a bunch of stuff to add. My main reason I couldn't
just copy the first one we did was all of these are page additions, not
new configurators. When we get to making new configurators again, we
will just copy the old ones over and modify them.
Paul Millsaps
Time Manufacturing
254.399.2170
paulm@... <mailto:paulm@...>
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and
notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
intended recipient.
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Gotschall
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:31 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Faster way to enter Product Configurator Rules
I agree, its not the best interface in the world, but I've seen worse.
I haven't found any way to add a "batch" of rules. I personally prefer
staying out of the Configurator rules and modifying the Method when I
can.. In most cases I can set a "keep when" rule on the operation and
not have to set anything on the materials under the operation since if
the operation is not used then the materials for the operation don't get
used. If I need to change the materials or quantities under an
operation, then I can do this in the method and I don't have to change
the rules in the configurator.
One thing I do that might be considered out of the norm is that I have a
set of operations for each product in our configurator. Lets take
chairs for an example. We may make 30 different models of chairs.
Instead of having one set of operations in the super BOM for the
configurator and doing keep when rules on the materials, I have 30
different sets of operations. The first model of chair has operations
10 through 190, the second model has operations of 200 through 390, etc.
This way, when chair model xxx is selected, I only have to keep
operations xxx through xxx and discard the rest. The downside to this
is that you are duplicating operations many times with different op
numbers.
----- Original Message ----
From: Calvin Krusen <ckrusen@... <mailto:ckrusen%40comcast.net>
>To: vantage@yahoogroups..com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups..com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2008 3:54:40 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Faster way to enter Product Configurator Rules
Is there a quicker way to enter the product configurator rules?
It doesn't allow the Copy & Paste function in the Rules grid. Actually
it allows the Copy function, but not the Paste.
It would work better for me if the default for each material was to NOT
be included, and only rules that explicty call for the component would
add it. I like to put 'potential' components in a Part's method, and
set the Keep When rule to 'false'. Then if I ever need use them in the
future, I only need modify the Configurator, and don't have to touch
the BOM/MOM.
Are there any "tricks" to make better use of the Product Configurator' s
horrible user interface?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]