DMR - accept to a different job

Yahoo Archive
1
There are no limitations in that respects. send all you like. If costing is a big deal to you, visibility to rework costs will be less by job occurances as you group rework from different jobs to a single job.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "mlezivk" <kevin.mleziva@...> wrote:
>
> Awesome thanks. Do you know if it works to send qty from more than one DMR to that same rework job?
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "rob.bucek" <rob.bucek@> wrote:
> >
> > Yes you can. We live by this. That is often because reworking the parts involves alot of other work centers that had nothing to do with the original MOM. Heres our typical scenario. A nonconformance is identified, and goes through inspection, to DMR where it is dispositioned as material to another job(we often name that job RWK+ the original jobnumber.) If you accept to operation you it forces you to go back to the orignal operation on the original job. Accepting to material allows you to get around this. We set up another job with the routing we need to complete the rework. We then add as material to the first operation on that new job the original part number in the quantity that will be reworked (be sure to get the related operseq correct). Then you call out that Job, assembly, and material from the accept/material tab in the DRM. From a costing standpoint this works out well too for us. There are a few more twists to it in our scenario but probably dont apply unless you want to get the rework costs captured by the original job. That would take you to a job to job (as material) ride.
> > 3--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "mlezivk" <kevin.mleziva@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I was curious if anyone has had any luck with a work-around for accepting a discrepant material to a job that is different from where it came from. We have one line of parts that have a high discrepant rate, so we set aside the ones to be reworked and wait until we have a large enough group to rework them. It would be great if we could send them to DMR off of their original jobs, and then send them all to one rework job after awhile.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kevin Mleziva
> > > Ace Precision Machining
> > > 262 252-4003 x1353
> > >
> >
>
2
I was curious if anyone has had any luck with a work-around for accepting a discrepant material to a job that is different from where it came from. We have one line of parts that have a high discrepant rate, so we set aside the ones to be reworked and wait until we have a large enough group to rework them. It would be great if we could send them to DMR off of their original jobs, and then send them all to one rework job after awhile.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Kevin Mleziva
Ace Precision Machining
262 252-4003 x1353
3
Yes you can. We live by this. That is often because reworking the parts involves alot of other work centers that had nothing to do with the original MOM. Heres our typical scenario. A nonconformance is identified, and goes through inspection, to DMR where it is dispositioned as material to another job(we often name that job RWK+ the original jobnumber.) If you accept to operation you it forces you to go back to the orignal operation on the original job. Accepting to material allows you to get around this. We set up another job with the routing we need to complete the rework. We then add as material to the first operation on that new job the original part number in the quantity that will be reworked (be sure to get the related operseq correct). Then you call out that Job, assembly, and material from the accept/material tab in the DRM. From a costing standpoint this works out well too for us. There are a few more twists to it in our scenario but probably dont apply unless you want to get the rework costs captured by the original job. That would take you to a job to job (as material) ride.
3--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "mlezivk" <kevin.mleziva@...> wrote:
>
> I was curious if anyone has had any luck with a work-around for accepting a discrepant material to a job that is different from where it came from. We have one line of parts that have a high discrepant rate, so we set aside the ones to be reworked and wait until we have a large enough group to rework them. It would be great if we could send them to DMR off of their original jobs, and then send them all to one rework job after awhile.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin Mleziva
> Ace Precision Machining
> 262 252-4003 x1353
>
4
When you do the DMR disposition, you can send them off to a rework job.
You have to do each disposition individually, but you can send them all
to the same job. Can't you? To tell you the truth, I have never tried.



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of mlezivk
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:42 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] DMR - accept to a different job



I was curious if anyone has had any luck with a work-around for
accepting a discrepant material to a job that is different from where it
came from. We have one line of parts that have a high discrepant rate,
so we set aside the ones to be reworked and wait until we have a large
enough group to rework them. It would be great if we could send them to
DMR off of their original jobs, and then send them all to one rework job
after awhile.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Kevin Mleziva
Ace Precision Machining
262 252-4003 x1353





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
5
That is correct. All that is required is to identify a job number, an assembly, and a material tied to an assembly/operation.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "CharlieSmith" <CSmith@...> wrote:
>
> When you do the DMR disposition, you can send them off to a rework job.
> You have to do each disposition individually, but you can send them all
> to the same job. Can't you? To tell you the truth, I have never tried.
>
>
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of mlezivk
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:42 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] DMR - accept to a different job
>
>
>
> I was curious if anyone has had any luck with a work-around for
> accepting a discrepant material to a job that is different from where it
> came from. We have one line of parts that have a high discrepant rate,
> so we set aside the ones to be reworked and wait until we have a large
> enough group to rework them. It would be great if we could send them to
> DMR off of their original jobs, and then send them all to one rework job
> after awhile.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin Mleziva
> Ace Precision Machining
> 262 252-4003 x1353
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
6
Im currently working on a SC workflow that will automate all that based on an user menu choice at the Inspection processing form using a BPM.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "CharlieSmith" <CSmith@...> wrote:
>
> When you do the DMR disposition, you can send them off to a rework job.
> You have to do each disposition individually, but you can send them all
> to the same job. Can't you? To tell you the truth, I have never tried.
>
>
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of mlezivk
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:42 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] DMR - accept to a different job
>
>
>
> I was curious if anyone has had any luck with a work-around for
> accepting a discrepant material to a job that is different from where it
> came from. We have one line of parts that have a high discrepant rate,
> so we set aside the ones to be reworked and wait until we have a large
> enough group to rework them. It would be great if we could send them to
> DMR off of their original jobs, and then send them all to one rework job
> after awhile.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin Mleziva
> Ace Precision Machining
> 262 252-4003 x1353
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
7
Awesome thanks. Do you know if it works to send qty from more than one DMR to that same rework job?


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "rob.bucek" <rob.bucek@...> wrote:
>
> Yes you can. We live by this. That is often because reworking the parts involves alot of other work centers that had nothing to do with the original MOM. Heres our typical scenario. A nonconformance is identified, and goes through inspection, to DMR where it is dispositioned as material to another job(we often name that job RWK+ the original jobnumber.) If you accept to operation you it forces you to go back to the orignal operation on the original job. Accepting to material allows you to get around this. We set up another job with the routing we need to complete the rework. We then add as material to the first operation on that new job the original part number in the quantity that will be reworked (be sure to get the related operseq correct). Then you call out that Job, assembly, and material from the accept/material tab in the DRM. From a costing standpoint this works out well too for us. There are a few more twists to it in our scenario but probably dont apply unless you want to get the rework costs captured by the original job. That would take you to a job to job (as material) ride.
> 3--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "mlezivk" <kevin.mleziva@> wrote:
> >
> > I was curious if anyone has had any luck with a work-around for accepting a discrepant material to a job that is different from where it came from. We have one line of parts that have a high discrepant rate, so we set aside the ones to be reworked and wait until we have a large enough group to rework them. It would be great if we could send them to DMR off of their original jobs, and then send them all to one rework job after awhile.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin Mleziva
> > Ace Precision Machining
> > 262 252-4003 x1353
> >
>