Browser based version 9?

Yahoo Archive
1
Is it true: Yes
Does it work: "Yes"

However It is extremely slow, almost unusable

*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Manasa Reddy <manasa@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Is it true and does it work?
>
> Someone has mentioned that Epicor 9 has a browser based version. I want
> to know if anyone is using this capability and the pros and cons for it.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Manasa
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
Is it true and does it work?



Someone has mentioned that Epicor 9 has a browser based version. I want
to know if anyone is using this capability and the pros and cons for it.



Thanks in advance!







Manasa





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
3
It works in the technical sense. While it looks promising; the performance
issues really prevent it from being anywhere near a viable replacement for
the normal client.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Manasa Reddy <manasa@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Is it true and does it work?
>
> Someone has mentioned that Epicor 9 has a browser based version. I want
> to know if anyone is using this capability and the pros and cons for it.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Manasa
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>



--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]