I reported this problem a long time ago. It used to work and then
it stopped during one of the patches. Even in the help of my
version I think it stated that it would change. The answer to me
was that it is an error in the help file and they will fix the help
file in a later relase. Go figure.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Robert Brown <robertb_versa@...>
wrote:
the way down to the release level. There are also related boolean
fields that are intended to drive the change notice process. (Did
something change? If so what? - and what did it change from?)
accurate change notice (that were being updated properly on prior
versions 403 & 404) were broken with the fairly significant
underlying code rewrite on 405a.
being populated, problematic behavior of Misc type lines, no
validation of whether a Part Rev was approved... etc., etc., ad
nauseum). This customization survived the 404 upgrade but completely
broke on 405. This lead to our discovery of just how significant 405
(a) was changed.
broke about half that many new things (previously working) in the
process.
look at table.column SysRptLst.RptDescription and if it matches your
PO form's description (I think default is "PURCHASE ORDER"), then
set the POhead field to change notice (for the next time).
it stopped during one of the patches. Even in the help of my
version I think it stated that it would change. The answer to me
was that it is an error in the help file and they will fix the help
file in a later relase. Go figure.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Robert Brown <robertb_versa@...>
wrote:
>lying to you. It has nothing to do with print performance.
> Well - I can't put it any more bluntly than to say development is
>is littered with fields that hold last price, qty, date, etc., all
> If you look at the table schema that makes up a PO, you'll see it
the way down to the release level. There are also related boolean
fields that are intended to drive the change notice process. (Did
something change? If so what? - and what did it change from?)
>process.
> On 403, just enough of these worked to drive the change notice
>BO - but a handful of critical ones necessary to really print an
> In 405a, MORE of these fields are finally being populated by the
accurate change notice (that were being updated properly on prior
versions 403 & 404) were broken with the fairly significant
underlying code rewrite on 405a.
>compensate for application bugs (U/M's and conversion factors not
> We had some pretty significant customizations in place on 403 to
being populated, problematic behavior of Misc type lines, no
validation of whether a Part Rev was approved... etc., etc., ad
nauseum). This customization survived the 404 upgrade but completely
broke on 405. This lead to our discovery of just how significant 405
(a) was changed.
>always seems to be the case, they fixed a half a dozen things and
> Most changes to PO Entry on 405 were for the better... However, as
broke about half that many new things (previously working) in the
process.
>event trigger on Epicor.Mfg.BO.ReportMonitor (method Update). Then
>
> I've never tried it, but I suppose you could try an after method
look at table.column SysRptLst.RptDescription and if it matches your
PO form's description (I think default is "PURCHASE ORDER"), then
set the POhead field to change notice (for the next time).
>Changed
> Total stab in the dark on my part. Hope it helps in some way.
>
> Rob
>
> --- On Fri, 10/31/08, bw2868bond <bwalker@...> wrote:
>
> From: bw2868bond <bwalker@...>
> Subject: [Vantage] BPM for changing Print Order as flags
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 8:00 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Vantage 8.00.811 would automatically set the Print Order as
> flag whenever a printed PO was altered. Vantage 8.0.405 does not.(we
> never really tested 8.03.305 as it was too buggy so I dont know ifit
> changed there)to
>
> I logged a call with support - after being verified and kicked up
> development, the response has been:8.03.4xx
> "Wanted to let you know that I already received a response from
> development regarding this issue, they responded that as of
> this is working as design, Vantage is now leaving this radiobutton
> up to the customer."allow
>
> I suggested that there should be an option in company setup to
> the customer to choose and received this response:design
> "Their response is that for printing performance reasons the
> was left open for the customer to decide."boolean
>
> I am totally confused by that statement as print as flag is a
> field that is sent to the Crystal data regardless.is
>
> So, with all that off my chest, Has anyone developed a BPM to
> automatically switch the Print as Changed flag when a printed PO
> altered that I could use *or* is anyone privy to the logic thatcould
> be used to create such a BPM?done
>
> How can one tell if a PO has been Printed as New so that when
> something is changed on the PO and it is updated (saved) then the
> Print Order as Changed can be set? I am sure that must have been
> in the back end progress procedure running on the server in8.00.811
>
> ,
> _))._
> /`'---'`\
> | <\ /> |
> | \ ^ / |
> \ '-'-' /
> jgs '--'----'
>