BOM Costing problem

Yahoo Archive
1
I found the problem. It looks like there was another revision that had the same effective date for the top level part. The BOM has the same material so I don't know why it caused that type of problem.

________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Stan Chmura
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:17 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] BOM Costing problem


Staring with the basics: but is the sub assy part marked as standard cost;
manufactured part and is there an approved methods master with valid costs
for the components?



_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
Jasper Recto
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:15 AM
To: Vantage Groups (vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>)
Subject: [Vantage] BOM Costing problem

I have a top level part that has a subAssembly component. This subAssembly
is setup as view as assembly only, not pull as assembly.

When I run a BOM Cost report, the cost show up as zero for everything and it
makes the top level part cost incorrect.

Any ideas why this is happening?

Thanks,
Jasper

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
I have a top level part that has a subAssembly component. This subAssembly is setup as view as assembly only, not pull as assembly.

When I run a BOM Cost report, the cost show up as zero for everything and it makes the top level part cost incorrect.

Any ideas why this is happening?

Thanks,
Jasper


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
3
Staring with the basics: but is the sub assy part marked as standard cost;
manufactured part and is there an approved methods master with valid costs
for the components?



_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Jasper Recto
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:15 AM
To: Vantage Groups (vantage@yahoogroups.com)
Subject: [Vantage] BOM Costing problem

I have a top level part that has a subAssembly component. This subAssembly
is setup as view as assembly only, not pull as assembly.

When I run a BOM Cost report, the cost show up as zero for everything and it
makes the top level part cost incorrect.

Any ideas why this is happening?

Thanks,
Jasper

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4
Is the sub-assembly flagged as Purchased rather than Manufactured......

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
Stan Chmura
Sent: 24 July 2008 15:17
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] BOM Costing problem


Staring with the basics: but is the sub assy part marked as standard cost;
manufactured part and is there an approved methods master with valid costs
for the components?



_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of
Jasper Recto
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:15 AM
To: Vantage Groups (vantage@yahoogroups.com)
Subject: [Vantage] BOM Costing problem

I have a top level part that has a subAssembly component. This subAssembly
is setup as view as assembly only, not pull as assembly.

When I run a BOM Cost report, the cost show up as zero for everything and
it
makes the top level part cost incorrect.

Any ideas why this is happening?

Thanks,
Jasper

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]