2 stub check Blank Title 52779

Yahoo Archive
1
I forgot to mention the layout from top to bottom is Stub\Check\Stub

The lower stub is a sub-report, the upper stub and check are the header.



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Gerard Wadman
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 12:47 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: 2 stub check



I modified the canned Crystal check into a two stub check.

It works very well but the only downside is that we can't fit as many
line items on it, this wouldn't be a problem except for the fact that
Vantage fails to recognize that two pages have been written and doesn't
skip a number.

As a work around, any APs with more than 17 line items are entered
exclusively in their own batch, fortunately for us that doesn't happen
very often.

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of robertjardim
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:57 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 2 stub check

We have been trying to get the same thing.

The check is on the top followed by two stubs, which are exactly the
same.

If anyone has an example that works with Vantage 8 perhaps they can
post it up in the user group files section.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
Has anyone created an AP check wihtwo stubs where both stubs show the
same info?
3
We've done it for many customers. But we've done it with Crystal forms, not Progress.

________________________________

De : vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] De la part de David
Envoyé : 26 octobre 2006 14:26
À : vantage@yahoogroups.com
Objet : [Vantage] 2 stub check

Has anyone created an AP check wihtwo stubs where both stubs show the
same info?



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4
Hi David,



I asked this question a while back and someone sent me a 2 stub check
off-line.

It was designed with Crystal 8.5 and it looks like it's for Vantage 6.1
and I haven't had a chance to convert it for Vantage 8 but if you want I
can forward you what I have to get you started.



Thanks,

Joe Rojas

IT Manager

TNCO, Inc.

781-447-6661 x7506

jrojas@...



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of David
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] 2 stub check



Has anyone created an AP check wihtwo stubs where both stubs show the
same info?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
5
Curious why?

----- Original Message -----
From: David
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:25 PM
Subject: [Vantage] 2 stub check


Has anyone created an AP check wihtwo stubs where both stubs show the
same info?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
6
Yes,

I it's a Crystal Report, and I used a subreport for the second part of
the check.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "David" <fishdi@...> wrote:
>
> Has anyone created an AP check wihtwo stubs where both stubs show the
> same info?
>
7
Because we prefer using a laser check with 2 stubs, of which we keep one.



_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Robert Christian
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:35 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 2 stub check



Curious why?

----- Original Message -----
From: David
To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:25 PM
Subject: [Vantage] 2 stub check

Has anyone created an AP check wihtwo stubs where both stubs show the
same info?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
8
We have been trying to get the same thing.

The check is on the top followed by two stubs, which are exactly the
same.

If anyone has an example that works with Vantage 8 perhaps they can
post it up in the user group files section.
9
We had a two stub check done in Crystal Reports that worked just fine
until a patch that was applied about six month ago. I have tried to
retool that report to no avail, so we're back to a one stub check.
Joe, I would appreciate a look at your two-stub form to see if I can
get it to work for us, or at least glean some insight into how to
make ours work. Thanks'

James Moore
LCEI
954-861-2828

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Rojas" <jrojas@...> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>
>
> I asked this question a while back and someone sent me a 2 stub
check
> off-line.
>
> It was designed with Crystal 8.5 and it looks like it's for Vantage
6.1
> and I haven't had a chance to convert it for Vantage 8 but if you
want I
> can forward you what I have to get you started.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe Rojas
>
> IT Manager
>
> TNCO, Inc.
>
> 781-447-6661 x7506
>
> jrojas@...
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of David
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:26 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] 2 stub check
>
>
>
> Has anyone created an AP check wihtwo stubs where both stubs show
the
> same info?
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
10
I'd also appreciate seeing that report



David Fishman

AZ BLOCK 2000, LLC

520-744-3890



_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
jmoore33309
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 9:07 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 2 stub check



We had a two stub check done in Crystal Reports that worked just fine
until a patch that was applied about six month ago. I have tried to
retool that report to no avail, so we're back to a one stub check.
Joe, I would appreciate a look at your two-stub form to see if I can
get it to work for us, or at least glean some insight into how to
make ours work. Thanks'

James Moore
LCEI
954-861-2828

--- In vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com, "Joe
Rojas" <jrojas@...> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>
>
> I asked this question a while back and someone sent me a 2 stub
check
> off-line.
>
> It was designed with Crystal 8.5 and it looks like it's for Vantage
6.1
> and I haven't had a chance to convert it for Vantage 8 but if you
want I
> can forward you what I have to get you started.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe Rojas
>
> IT Manager
>
> TNCO, Inc.
>
> 781-447-6661 x7506
>
> jrojas@...
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com] On
Behalf
> Of David
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:26 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com
> Subject: [Vantage] 2 stub check
>
>
>
> Has anyone created an AP check wihtwo stubs where both stubs show
the
> same info?
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
11
I modified the canned Crystal check into a two stub check.

It works very well but the only downside is that we can't fit as many
line items on it, this wouldn't be a problem except for the fact that
Vantage fails to recognize that two pages have been written and doesn't
skip a number.



As a work around, any APs with more than 17 line items are entered
exclusively in their own batch, fortunately for us that doesn't happen
very often.





________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of robertjardim
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:57 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 2 stub check



We have been trying to get the same thing.

The check is on the top followed by two stubs, which are exactly the
same.

If anyone has an example that works with Vantage 8 perhaps they can
post it up in the user group files section.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]