Automatic Backflush material quanity off by tiny amounts?

Not off the top of my head, I’d have to look at where that would happen.

Also, I wonder if changing the rounding methods to round up instead of math rounding would fix the issue? (I kinda doubt it though).

We don’t backflush here, (that was an old job). So I don’t really have any testing data handy.

image

@klincecum I do a labor rollup on labor.update, but only on the total quantity of the final operation of the job, so it only runs once per job because we want the wip earned on the job.

The same would work for this material, check conditions pre processing to do the job material check post processing. I would just mark any backflush material complete, but you could do some fancy round to 2 places and check for variances.

1 Like